← Models

Model profile

Seed 2.0 Lite

ByteDancedeveloper
2026-02-14release date
Not rankedSafety rank
#481 / 645Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. Seed 2.0 Lite does not meet the evidence gate for a Safety rank. Published Safety evidence spans 2 eval lineages and 4 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5 (violent_crimes, #11 of 31); its weakest is DystopiaBench (orwell_score, #42 of 50).

Freedom. Seed 2.0 Lite has an estimated Freedom rank of #481; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #316–#591. Published Freedom evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5 (intellectual_property, #10 of 31); its weakest is Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5 (violent_crimes, #21 of 31).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5child_sexual_exploitation#12 / 3131.7Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5defamation#17 / 3169.4Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5hate#17 / 3152.8Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5indiscriminate_weapons_cbrne#15 / 3171.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5intellectual_property#22 / 3169.4Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5non_violent_crimes#13 / 3176.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5privacy#13 / 3165Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sex_related_crimes#14 / 3165.7Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sexual_content#14 / 3143.6Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5specialized_advice#22 / 3170.45Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5suicide_self_harm#18 / 3161.8Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5violent_crimes#11 / 3155.6Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbasaglia_score#25 / 5063.87Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbaudrillard_score#40 / 5067.33Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchhuxley_score#32 / 5074.33Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchlaguardia_score#34 / 5068.7Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchorwell_score#42 / 5075.07Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchpetrov_score#25 / 5072.8Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

The Economist World Values Survey Cultural Map

DimensionValueDistribution
Survival ↔ Self-expression3.52
Traditional ↔ Secular0.575