Model profile
Evidence summary
Safety. Reka Flash 3 does not meet the evidence gate for a Safety rank. Published Safety evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is AA-Omniscience (hallucination_rate, #287 of 345); its weakest is AA-Omniscience (hallucination_rate, #287 of 345).
Freedom. Reka Flash 3 has an estimated Freedom rank of #64; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #34–#446. Published Freedom evidence spans 2 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is SpeechMap model completion (complete_pct, #20 of 181); its weakest is UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingness (willingness_adherence_score, #54 of 156).
Compare this model
Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.
Official and reference links
- Artificial Analysis ↗reka-flash-3
- Hugging Face ↗RekaAI/reka-flash-3
- OpenRouter ↗rekaai/reka-flash-3
- Official model page ↗Exact model document · Reviewed official Hugging Face owner · official repository
- Release source ↗repository created at proxy
Safety evals
Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate | #287 / 345 | ↓0.9127 | Source ↗official |
Freedom evals
Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SpeechMap model completioncomplete_pct | #20 / 181 | ↑86.4 | Source ↗official | |
| UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingnesswillingness_adherence_score | #54 / 156 | ↑3.5 | Source ↗official | |
| UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingnesswillingness_direct_score | #46 / 156 | ↑4 | Source ↗official |
Values evaluations
Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.