Model profile
Qwen3.5 27B
Evidence summary
Qwen3.5 27B has an estimated overall rank of #28; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #16–#128. Its behavior-only rank is #14; company governance moves the combined estimate to #28. Published evidence spans 3 evals and 6 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (harmful_attack_non_success_rate, #17 of 260); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #244 of 260).
Compare this model
Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.
Official and reference links
- Artificial Analysis ↗qwen3-5-27b
- Hugging Face ↗Qwen/Qwen3.5-27B
- OpenRouter ↗qwen/qwen3.5-27b
- Official model page ↗Exact model document · Reviewed official Hugging Face owner · official repository
- Release source ↗repository created at proxy
Published eval results
Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Better | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate | #113 / 311 | 0.7415 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate | #34 / 260 | 39.53 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate | #244 / 260 | 71.17 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate | #17 / 260 | 98.89 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate | #128 / 258 | 96.36 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| VETO Misfired Alignmentmisfired_alignment_rate_pct | #4 / 25 | 5.5 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official |
Values evaluations
Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.