Model profile
Qwen3.5 122B A10B
2026-02-24release date
2eval lineages
Evidence summary
Published evidence spans 2 evals and 4 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (harmful_attack_non_success_rate, #24 of 260); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #247 of 260).
Compare this model
Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.
Official and reference links
- Artificial Analysis ↗qwen3-5-122b-a10b
- Hugging Face ↗Qwen/Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- OpenRouter ↗qwen/qwen3.5-122b-a10b
- Official model page ↗Exact model document · Reviewed official Hugging Face owner · official repository
- Release source ↗repository created at proxy
Published eval results
Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Better | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate | #203 / 311 | 0.8545 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate | #32 / 260 | 40.31 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate | #247 / 260 | 70.17 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate | #24 / 260 | 97.78 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate | #128 / 258 | 96.36 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official |
Values evaluations
Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.