← Models

Model profile

Qwen3 32B

Alibabadeveloper
2025-04-29release date
#145 / 333Safety rank
#46 / 645Freedom rank
1discovery sources

Evidence summary

Safety. Qwen3 32B has an estimated Safety rank of #145; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #27–#290. Its behavior-only rank is #136; company governance moves the combined estimate to #145. Published Safety evidence spans 9 eval lineages and 7 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is TAC (base_welfare_rate, #5 of 87); its weakest is Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboard (single_turn_attack_success_rate, #99 of 104).

Freedom. Qwen3 32B has an estimated Freedom rank of #46; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #34–#262. Published Freedom evidence spans 7 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboard (single_turn_attack_success_rate, #6 of 104); its weakest is VETO Misfired Alignment (misfired_alignment_rate_pct, #15 of 25).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Finetunes

Direct finetunes linked to this canonical base model. Quantized and repackaged derivatives are excluded.

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Adversarial Poetry — AILuminate Baseline and Poetry ASRbaseline_asr#17 / 249.67Source ↗official
Adversarial Poetry — AILuminate Baseline and Poetry ASRpoetry_asr#20 / 2469.05Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardcorrigibility#18 / 244.087Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardhonesty#19 / 243.244Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardnon_manipulation#17 / 243.084Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardrobustness#20 / 243.107Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardsafety#21 / 243.327Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardscheming#20 / 243.385Source ↗official
Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate#99 / 10477.97Source ↗official
FinEval 6.0 Safety Awarenesssafety_awareness_score#3 / 881.93Source ↗official
PandaBench JBB direct-request panelsafety_rate#40 / 460.94Source ↗official
SOSBenchbiology_pvr#18 / 230.802Source ↗official
SOSBenchchemistry_pvr#21 / 230.784Source ↗official
SOSBenchmedicine_pvr#17 / 230.774Source ↗official
SOSBenchpharmacology_pvr#20 / 230.946Source ↗official
SOSBenchphysics_pvr#18 / 230.74Source ↗official
SOSBenchpsychology_pvr#17 / 230.746Source ↗official
TACbase_welfare_rate#5 / 8748.1Source ↗self run
Vectara HHEM Factual Consistencyfactual_consistency_rate#22 / 9494.1Source ↗official
VETO Misfired Alignmentmisfired_alignment_rate_pct#15 / 258.7Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Adversarial Poetry — AILuminate Baseline and Poetry ASRbaseline_asr#8 / 249.67Source ↗official
Adversarial Poetry — AILuminate Baseline and Poetry ASRpoetry_asr#5 / 2469.05Source ↗official
Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate#6 / 10477.97Source ↗official
PandaBench JBB direct-request panelsafety_rate#6 / 460.94Source ↗official
SOSBenchbiology_pvr#6 / 230.802Source ↗official
SOSBenchchemistry_pvr#3 / 230.784Source ↗official
SOSBenchmedicine_pvr#7 / 230.774Source ↗official
SOSBenchpharmacology_pvr#4 / 230.946Source ↗official
SOSBenchphysics_pvr#6 / 230.74Source ↗official
SOSBenchpsychology_pvr#7 / 230.746Source ↗official
SpeechMap model completioncomplete_pct#12 / 18189.8Source ↗official
UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingnesswillingness_adherence_score#44 / 1564.5Source ↗official
UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingnesswillingness_direct_score#79 / 1563Source ↗official
VETO Misfired Alignmentmisfired_alignment_rate_pct#15 / 258.7Source ↗official

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

UGI Political Values

DimensionValueDistribution
Political Lean-20.8
Government48.5
Diplomacy63.5
Economy47.9
Society60.5

CCPBench political narrative alignment

DimensionValueDistribution
CCP-narrative alignment — all questions1.9
CCP-narrative alignment — China topics2.09
CCP-narrative alignment — non-China controls1.3