← Models

Model profile

Qwen3 235B A22B

Alibabadeveloper
2025-04-29release date
#106 / 312overall rank
29eval lineages

Evidence summary

Qwen3 235B A22B has an estimated overall rank of #106; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #45–#211. Its behavior-only rank is #95; company governance moves the combined estimate to #106. Published evidence spans 29 evals and 7 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is HELM Safety (simple_safety_tests, #1 of 80); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #241 of 241).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Published eval results

Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AgentDrive Safety Compliancescr#13 / 4892.5Source ↗official
AIRBench 2024 Safety Scenariossafety_scenarios#22 / 800.79Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardcorrigibility#8 / 244.349Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardhonesty#14 / 243.581Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardnon_manipulation#10 / 243.523Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardrobustness#8 / 243.88Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardsafety#10 / 243.885Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardscheming#8 / 243.898Source ↗official
Anthropic Agentic Misalignment — blackmailmisaligned_action_rate_pct#2 / 169Source ↗official
Anthropic Agentic Misalignment — corporate espionagemisaligned_action_rate_pct#10 / 1676Source ↗official
BullshitBench v2clear_pushback_rate#100 / 1060.045Source ↗official
Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate#51 / 10437.49Source ↗official
Confabulationsconfabulation_rate#22 / 5218.56Source ↗official
Emergent Collusionhigh_illegality_game_rate#10 / 130.57Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#215 / 2419.3Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#241 / 24143.33Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#184 / 24146.67Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#66 / 23998.14Source ↗official
FlagEval Safety and Valuesa1_qualified_rate#15 / 1871.76Source ↗official
FlagEval Safety and Valuesa2_qualified_rate#16 / 1873.77Source ↗official
FlagEval Safety and Valuesa3_qualified_rate#17 / 1875.56Source ↗official
FlagEval Safety and Valuesa4_qualified_rate#17 / 1878.27Source ↗official
FlagEval Safety and Valuesa5_qualified_rate#16 / 1865.07Source ↗official
FORTRESSaverage_risk_score#46 / 4961.39Source ↗official
FORTRESSover_refusal_score#2 / 480.98Source ↗official
HELM Safetyanthropic_red_team#2 / 800.999Source ↗official
HELM Safetybbq#20 / 800.962Source ↗official
HELM Safetyharmbench#37 / 800.796Source ↗official
HELM Safetysimple_safety_tests#1 / 801Source ↗official
HELM Safetyxstest#4 / 800.986Source ↗official
HUMAINE Trust, Ethics and Safetytrust_ethics_safety_score#14 / 5427.99Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchethics#15 / 4360.81Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchfactuality#9 / 4369.98Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchlegality#11 / 4373.51Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchprivacy#10 / 4372.57Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchpsychological_health#11 / 4369.27Source ↗official
Manager Coercion Benchcoercion_ladder_depth#20 / 338.733Source ↗self run
MASKlying_probability_pct#32 / 5343.6Source ↗official
PacifAIstp_score#2 / 789.46Source ↗official
Shelleducation_jsr#5 / 140.492Source ↗official
Shellfinance_jsr#4 / 140.3Source ↗official
Shellmanagement_jsr#6 / 140.518Source ↗official
Social Welfare Function Benchmarkfairness#12 / 190.478Source ↗official
SOSBenchbiology_pvr#21 / 230.852Source ↗official
SOSBenchchemistry_pvr#20 / 230.76Source ↗official
SOSBenchmedicine_pvr#22 / 230.868Source ↗official
SOSBenchpharmacology_pvr#18 / 230.934Source ↗official
SOSBenchphysics_pvr#19 / 230.764Source ↗official
SOSBenchpsychology_pvr#22 / 230.852Source ↗official
SpeciesismBenchexplicit_speciesism_scale#5 / 72.487Source ↗official
SpeciEvalbelief_animal_sentience#93 / 1136.45Source ↗official
SpeciEvalland_animal_4ns#65 / 1134.6Source ↗official
SpeciEvalsea_animal_4ns#103 / 1135.15Source ↗official
SpeciEvalspeciesism#69 / 1132.15Source ↗official
TACbase_welfare_rate#14 / 7635.9Source ↗self run
UAVBench safety-critical decision recognitionethical_safety_critical_accuracy#4 / 270.755Source ↗official
Vectara HHEM Factual Consistencyfactual_consistency_rate#41 / 9490.7Source ↗official

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

UGI Political Values

DimensionValueDistribution
Political Lean-26
Government46.9
Diplomacy69
Economy48.1
Society64.3