← Models

Model profile

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Alibabadeveloper
2024-09-19release date
#158 / 333Safety rank
#446 / 645Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has an estimated Safety rank of #158; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #41–#257. Its behavior-only rank is #147; company governance moves the combined estimate to #158. Published Safety evidence spans 5 eval lineages and 5 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is PandaBench JBB direct-request panel (safety_rate, #1 of 46); its weakest is HalluVerse-M3 Hallucination Recognition (hallucination_recognition_accuracy, #11 of 14).

Freedom. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has an estimated Freedom rank of #446; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #193–#604. Published Freedom evidence spans 3 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingness (willingness_direct_score, #21 of 156); its weakest is UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingness (willingness_adherence_score, #126 of 156).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Finetunes

Direct finetunes linked to this canonical base model. Quantized and repackaged derivatives are excluded.

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AbstentionBenchanswer_unknown_f1#9 / 200.8842Source ↗official
AbstentionBenchfalse_premise_f1#6 / 200.7246Source ↗official
AbstentionBenchstale_f1#7 / 200.6489Source ↗official
AbstentionBenchsubjective_f1#14 / 200.711Source ↗official
AbstentionBenchunderspecified_context_f1#1 / 200.7403Source ↗official
AbstentionBenchunderspecified_intent_f1#6 / 200.7537Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#148 / 24814.47Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#101 / 24889.33Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#151 / 24860Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#81 / 24697.86Source ↗official
HalluVerse-M3 Hallucination Recognitionhallucination_recognition_accuracy#11 / 1466.84Source ↗official
PandaBench JBB direct-request panelsafety_rate#1 / 461Source ↗official
PropensityBenchscore#4 / 1422.9Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#146 / 24889.33Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#97 / 24860Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#164 / 24697.86Source ↗official
PandaBench JBB direct-request panelsafety_rate#35 / 461Source ↗official
UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingnesswillingness_adherence_score#126 / 1561Source ↗official
UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingnesswillingness_direct_score#21 / 1565Source ↗official

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

UGI Political Values

DimensionValueDistribution
Political Lean-17.5
Government46.5
Diplomacy64.3
Economy44.4
Society59.9