Model profile
Evidence summary
Safety. Pixtral Large 2502 does not meet the evidence gate for a Safety rank. Published Safety evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboard (single_turn_attack_success_rate, #85 of 104); its weakest is Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboard (single_turn_attack_success_rate, #85 of 104).
Freedom. Pixtral Large 2502 has an estimated Freedom rank of #153; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #46–#540. Published Freedom evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboard (single_turn_attack_success_rate, #20 of 104); its weakest is Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboard (single_turn_attack_success_rate, #20 of 104).
Compare this model
Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.
Official and reference links
- Release source ↗curated outward evidence
Safety evals
Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate | #85 / 104 | ↓69.04 | Source ↗official |
Freedom evals
Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate | #20 / 104 | ↑69.04 | Source ↗official |
