← Models

Model profile

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

2025-04-17release date
2eval lineages

Evidence summary

Published evidence spans 2 evals and 5 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is UAVBench safety-critical decision recognition (ethical_safety_critical_accuracy, #7 of 27); its weakest is FlagEval Safety and Values (a2_qualified_rate, #13 of 18).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Published eval results

Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionBetterSource
FlagEval Safety and Valuesa1_qualified_rate#7 / 1881.55↑ higherSource ↗official
FlagEval Safety and Valuesa2_qualified_rate#13 / 1878.31↑ higherSource ↗official
FlagEval Safety and Valuesa3_qualified_rate#6 / 1887.76↑ higherSource ↗official
FlagEval Safety and Valuesa4_qualified_rate#11 / 1887.95↑ higherSource ↗official
FlagEval Safety and Valuesa5_qualified_rate#13 / 1869.65↑ higherSource ↗official
UAVBench safety-critical decision recognitionethical_safety_critical_accuracy#7 / 270.735↑ higherSource ↗official