← Models

Model profile

Phi 3.5 Mini Instruct

Microsoftdeveloper
2024-08-22release date
#253 / 333Safety rank
#468 / 645Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. Phi 3.5 Mini Instruct has an estimated Safety rank of #253; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #106–#292. Its behavior-only rank is #255; company governance moves the combined estimate to #253. Published Safety evidence spans 5 eval lineages and 6 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #47 of 248); its weakest is Large-scale Moral Machine experiment on LLMs (human_choice_distance, #36 of 39).

Freedom. Phi 3.5 Mini Instruct has an estimated Freedom rank of #468; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #251–#538. Published Freedom evidence spans 4 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is AILuminate General Purpose AI Chat (child_sexual_exploitation, #10 of 32); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #199 of 248).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Finetunes

Direct finetunes linked to this canonical base model. Quantized and repackaged derivatives are excluded.

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatchild_sexual_exploitation#23 / 3226.1Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatdefamation#9 / 3210.3Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chathate#10 / 326.2Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatindiscriminate_weapons_cbrne#17 / 3224.9Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatintellectual_property#9 / 327.1Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatnon_violent_crimes#12 / 3214.1Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatprivacy#14 / 3211Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsex_related_crimes#17 / 3215Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsexual_content#17 / 3223.6Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatspecialized_advice#15 / 3215.1Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsuicide_self_harm#19 / 3214.2Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatviolent_crimes#16 / 3217.6Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#201 / 24811.37Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#47 / 24892Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#95 / 24879.44Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#90 / 24697.45Source ↗official
Large-scale Moral Machine experiment on LLMshuman_choice_distance#36 / 391.557Source ↗official
Microsoft Phi Safety Panelsharmful_continuation#3 / 100.006Source ↗official
Microsoft Phi Safety Panelsharmful_summarization#7 / 100.119Source ↗official
Microsoft Phi Safety Panelsjailbreak#5 / 100.119Source ↗official
Microsoft Phi Safety Panelsthird_party_harm#4 / 100.243Source ↗official
Open LLM Safety Indexjailbreakbench_safety_rate#4 / 210.6Source ↗official
Open LLM Safety Indexstrongreject_safety_rate#8 / 210.3333Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatchild_sexual_exploitation#10 / 3226.1Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatdefamation#24 / 3210.3Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chathate#22 / 326.2Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatindiscriminate_weapons_cbrne#16 / 3224.9Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatintellectual_property#24 / 327.1Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatnon_violent_crimes#21 / 3214.1Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatprivacy#18 / 3211Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsex_related_crimes#16 / 3215Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsexual_content#16 / 3223.6Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatspecialized_advice#18 / 3215.1Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsuicide_self_harm#14 / 3214.2Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatviolent_crimes#17 / 3217.6Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#199 / 24892Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#153 / 24879.44Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#154 / 24697.45Source ↗official
Microsoft Phi Safety Panelsharmful_continuation#8 / 100.006Source ↗official
Microsoft Phi Safety Panelsharmful_summarization#4 / 100.119Source ↗official
Microsoft Phi Safety Panelsjailbreak#6 / 100.119Source ↗official
Microsoft Phi Safety Panelsthird_party_harm#7 / 100.243Source ↗official
Open LLM Safety Indexjailbreakbench_safety_rate#16 / 210.6Source ↗official
Open LLM Safety Indexstrongreject_safety_rate#12 / 210.3333Source ↗official

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

ValueCompass

DimensionValueDistribution
Universalism75.8
Self-direction47.6
Care / Harm26
Fairness / Cheating24.3
Ethical91.1