← Models

Model profile

OLMo 3.1 32B Think

Ai2developer
2025-12-10release date
#273 / 333Safety rank
#625 / 645Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. OLMo 3.1 32B Think has an estimated Safety rank of #273; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #21–#317. Its behavior-only rank is #278; company governance moves the combined estimate to #273. Published Safety evidence spans 3 eval lineages and 2 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is AA-Omniscience (hallucination_rate, #112 of 345); its weakest is Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting) (factuality_bt_rating, #103 of 111).

Freedom. OLMo 3.1 32B Think has an estimated Freedom rank of #625; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #419–#643. Published Freedom evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is SpeechMap model completion (complete_pct, #163 of 181); its weakest is SpeechMap model completion (complete_pct, #163 of 181).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#112 / 3450.6629Source ↗official
Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating#103 / 1111392.0Source ↗official
HUMAINE Trust, Ethics and Safetytrust_ethics_safety_score#37 / 5425.83Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
SpeechMap model completioncomplete_pct#163 / 18132.5Source ↗official