← Models

Model profile

OLMo 3.1 32B Think

Ai2developer
2025-12-10release date
#290 / 348Safety rank
#642 / 663Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. OLMo 3.1 32B Think has an estimated Safety rank of #290; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #105–#334. Its behavior-only rank is #295; company governance moves the combined estimate to #290. Published Safety evidence spans 3 eval lineages and 2 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is AA-Omniscience (hallucination_rate, #127 of 361); its weakest is Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting) (factuality_bt_rating, #103 of 111).

Freedom. OLMo 3.1 32B Think has an estimated Freedom rank of #642; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #456–#661. Published Freedom evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is SpeechMap model completion (complete_pct, #163 of 181); its weakest is SpeechMap model completion (complete_pct, #163 of 181).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#127 / 361↓0.6629Source ↗official
Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating#103 / 111↑1392.0Source ↗official
HUMAINE Trust, Ethics and Safetytrust_ethics_safety_score#37 / 54↑25.83Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
SpeechMap model completioncomplete_pct#163 / 181↑32.5Source ↗official