← Models

Model profile

Nova Pro

Amazondeveloper
2024-12-03release date
#242 / 309overall rank
7eval lineages

Evidence summary

Nova Pro has an estimated overall rank of #242; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #95–#278. Its behavior-only rank is #244; company governance moves the combined estimate to #242. Published evidence spans 7 evals and 6 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is Vectara HHEM Factual Consistency (factual_consistency_rate, #8 of 94); its weakest is SpeciEval (sea_animal_4ns, #112 of 113).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Published eval results

Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#140 / 3280.7771Source ↗official
Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate#66 / 10453.34Source ↗official
Confabulationsconfabulation_rate#48 / 5254.46Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#125 / 24115.25Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#23 / 24194.5Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#77 / 24182.22Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#131 / 23995.82Source ↗official
RefusalBenchyouden_j#15 / 190.01282Source ↗official
SpeciEvalbelief_animal_sentience#99 / 1136.37Source ↗official
SpeciEvalland_animal_4ns#61 / 1134.58Source ↗official
SpeciEvalsea_animal_4ns#112 / 1135.6Source ↗official
SpeciEvalspeciesism#97 / 1132.65Source ↗official
Vectara HHEM Factual Consistencyfactual_consistency_rate#8 / 9494.9Source ↗official