Model profile
Nova Micro
Evidence summary
Safety. Nova Micro has an estimated Safety rank of #205; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #16–#281. Its behavior-only rank is #208; company governance moves the combined estimate to #205. Published Safety evidence spans 6 eval lineages and 5 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Vectara HHEM Factual Consistency (factual_consistency_rate, #16 of 94); its weakest is SpeciEval (land_animal_4ns, #123 of 123).
Freedom. Nova Micro has an estimated Freedom rank of #320; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #52–#539. Published Freedom evidence spans 2 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboard (single_turn_attack_success_rate, #22 of 104); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #167 of 248).
Compare this model
Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.
Official and reference links
- Artificial Analysis ↗nova-micro
- Official model documentation ↗Family-level model document · amazon · first party
- Release source ↗curated outward evidence
Safety evals
Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate | #109 / 345 | ↓0.6508 | Source ↗official | |
| AgentDrive Safety Compliancescr | #20 / 48 | ↑88.75 | Source ↗official | |
| Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate | #83 / 104 | ↓64.91 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate | #172 / 248 | ↑12.92 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate | #77 / 248 | ↑90.33 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate | #95 / 248 | ↑79.44 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate | #106 / 246 | ↑97.05 | Source ↗official | |
| SpeciEvalbelief_animal_sentience | #37 / 123 | ↑6.9 | Source ↗official | |
| SpeciEvalland_animal_4ns | #123 / 123 | ↓5.88 | Source ↗official | |
| SpeciEvalsea_animal_4ns | #123 / 123 | ↓6.3 | Source ↗official | |
| SpeciEvalspeciesism | #85 / 123 | ↓2.25 | Source ↗official | |
| Vectara HHEM Factual Consistencyfactual_consistency_rate | #16 / 94 | ↑94.5 | Source ↗official |
Freedom evals
Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate | #22 / 104 | ↑64.91 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate | #167 / 248 | ↓90.33 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate | #153 / 248 | ↓79.44 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate | #140 / 246 | ↓97.05 | Source ↗official |