Model profile
Evidence summary
Safety. Nova 2.0 Lite has an estimated Safety rank of #139; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #8–#304. Its behavior-only rank is #142; company governance moves the combined estimate to #139. Published Safety evidence spans 4 eval lineages and 2 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Vectara HHEM Factual Consistency (factual_consistency_rate, #8 of 94); its weakest is Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting) (factuality_bt_rating, #96 of 111).
Freedom. Nova 2.0 Lite has an estimated Freedom rank of #469; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #276–#591. Published Freedom evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboard (single_turn_attack_success_rate, #57 of 104); its weakest is Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboard (single_turn_attack_success_rate, #57 of 104).
Compare this model
Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.
Official and reference links
- Artificial Analysis ↗nova-2-0-lite
- Official model documentation ↗Family-level model document · amazon · first party
- Release source ↗curated outward evidence
Safety evals
Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate | #224 / 345 | ↓0.8587 | Source ↗official | |
| Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating | #96 / 111 | ↑1403.0 | Source ↗official | |
| Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate | #48 / 104 | ↓34.05 | Source ↗official | |
| Vectara HHEM Factual Consistencyfactual_consistency_rate | #8 / 94 | ↑94.9 | Source ↗official |
Freedom evals
Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate | #57 / 104 | ↑34.05 | Source ↗official |
Values evaluations
Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.