← Models

Model profile

Nova 2.0 Lite

Amazondeveloper
2025-12-02release date
#139 / 333Safety rank
#469 / 645Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. Nova 2.0 Lite has an estimated Safety rank of #139; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #8–#304. Its behavior-only rank is #142; company governance moves the combined estimate to #139. Published Safety evidence spans 4 eval lineages and 2 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Vectara HHEM Factual Consistency (factual_consistency_rate, #8 of 94); its weakest is Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting) (factuality_bt_rating, #96 of 111).

Freedom. Nova 2.0 Lite has an estimated Freedom rank of #469; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #276–#591. Published Freedom evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboard (single_turn_attack_success_rate, #57 of 104); its weakest is Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboard (single_turn_attack_success_rate, #57 of 104).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#224 / 3450.8587Source ↗official
Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating#96 / 1111403.0Source ↗official
Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate#48 / 10434.05Source ↗official
Vectara HHEM Factual Consistencyfactual_consistency_rate#8 / 9494.9Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate#57 / 10434.05Source ↗official

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

The Economist World Values Survey Cultural Map

DimensionValueDistribution
Survival ↔ Self-expression1.69
Traditional ↔ Secular0.224