Model profile
Evidence summary
Safety. Nanbeige4.1 3B does not meet the evidence gate for a Safety rank. Published Safety evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is AA-Omniscience (hallucination_rate, #91 of 345); its weakest is AA-Omniscience (hallucination_rate, #91 of 345).
Freedom. Nanbeige4.1 3B has an estimated Freedom rank of #323; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #143–#492. Published Freedom evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingness (willingness_direct_score, #21 of 156); its weakest is UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingness (willingness_adherence_score, #126 of 156).
Compare this model
Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.
Official and reference links
- Artificial Analysis ↗nanbeige4-1-3b
- Hugging Face ↗Nanbeige/Nanbeige4.1-3B
- Release source ↗repository created at proxy
Finetunes
Direct finetunes linked to this canonical base model. Quantized and repackaged derivatives are excluded.
heretic-org/Nanbeige4.1-3B-heretic ↗Direct non-quantized finetune documented by Hugging Face metadata
Safety evals
Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate | #91 / 345 | ↓0.581 | Source ↗official |
Freedom evals
Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingnesswillingness_adherence_score | #126 / 156 | ↑1 | Source ↗official | |
| UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingnesswillingness_direct_score | #21 / 156 | ↑5 | Source ↗official |
Values evaluations
Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.
