← Models

Model profile

Mixtral 8X22B Instruct

Mistral AIdeveloper
2024-04-17release date
#281 / 312overall rank
9eval lineages

Evidence summary

Mixtral 8X22B Instruct has an estimated overall rank of #281; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #52–#305. Its behavior-only rank is #272; company governance moves the combined estimate to #281. Published evidence spans 9 evals and 5 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #73 of 241); its weakest is Qwen2 Safety Panel (illegal, #3 of 3).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Published eval results

Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AIRBench 2024 Safety Scenariossafety_scenarios#71 / 800.44Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#187 / 24111.89Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#73 / 24190.67Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#168 / 24153.89Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#88 / 23997.45Source ↗official
FORTRESSaverage_risk_score#41 / 4956.06Source ↗official
FORTRESSover_refusal_score#17 / 482.77Source ↗official
HELM Safetyanthropic_red_team#70 / 800.962Source ↗official
HELM Safetybbq#52 / 800.916Source ↗official
HELM Safetyharmbench#68 / 800.521Source ↗official
HELM Safetysimple_safety_tests#74 / 800.915Source ↗official
HELM Safetyxstest#55 / 800.941Source ↗official
Qwen2 Safety Panelfraud#3 / 38.49Source ↗official
Qwen2 Safety Panelillegal#3 / 36.87Source ↗official
Qwen2 Safety Panelpornography#3 / 333.82Source ↗official
Qwen2 Safety Panelprivacy#3 / 315.03Source ↗official