Model profile
Mistral Nemo
Evidence summary
Mistral Nemo has an estimated overall rank of #214; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #100–#265. Its behavior-only rank is #205; company governance moves the combined estimate to #214. Published evidence spans 4 evals and 5 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is Large-scale Moral Machine experiment on LLMs (human_choice_distance, #6 of 39); its weakest is Microsoft Phi Safety Panels (third_party_harm, #10 of 10).
Compare this model
Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.
Official and reference links
- Hugging Face ↗mistralai/Mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
- OpenRouter ↗mistralai/mistral-nemo
- Official model page ↗Exact model document · Reviewed official Hugging Face owner · official repository
- Release source ↗scoring identity family inherited
Published eval results
Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Better | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUMAINE Trust, Ethics and Safetytrust_ethics_safety_score | #51 / 54 | 22.99 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| Large-scale Moral Machine experiment on LLMshuman_choice_distance | #6 / 39 | 0.7889 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| Microsoft Phi Safety Panelsharmful_continuation | #8 / 10 | 0.025 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| Microsoft Phi Safety Panelsharmful_summarization | #4 / 10 | 0.11 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| Microsoft Phi Safety Panelsjailbreak | #10 / 10 | 0.174 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| Microsoft Phi Safety Panelsthird_party_harm | #10 / 10 | 0.599 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| SpeciEvalbelief_animal_sentience | #100 / 102 | 6.06 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| SpeciEvalland_animal_4ns | #74 / 102 | 4.77 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| SpeciEvalsea_animal_4ns | #79 / 102 | 5.03 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| SpeciEvalspeciesism | #71 / 102 | 2.33 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official |
Values evaluations
Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.