← Models

Model profile

Mistral 7B Instruct

Mistral AIdeveloper
2023-09-27release date
#274 / 333Safety rank
#40 / 645Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. Mistral 7B Instruct has an estimated Safety rank of #274; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #199–#294. Its behavior-only rank is #262; company governance moves the combined estimate to #274. Published Safety evidence spans 24 eval lineages and 7 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (bias_attack_non_success_rate, #40 of 248); its weakest is COMPL-AI TensorTrust Goal-Hijacking Resistance (score, #13 of 13).

Freedom. Mistral 7B Instruct has an estimated Freedom rank of #40; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #48–#213. Published Freedom evidence spans 18 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is HELM Safety (harmbench, #2 of 80); its weakest is HELM Safety (xstest, #77 of 80).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Finetunes

Direct finetunes linked to this canonical base model. Quantized and repackaged derivatives are excluded.

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#177 / 3450.8126Source ↗official
AbstentionBenchanswer_unknown_f1#15 / 200.8549Source ↗official
AbstentionBenchfalse_premise_f1#11 / 200.6706Source ↗official
AbstentionBenchstale_f1#15 / 200.6004Source ↗official
AbstentionBenchsubjective_f1#15 / 200.7038Source ↗official
AbstentionBenchunderspecified_context_f1#7 / 200.6605Source ↗official
AbstentionBenchunderspecified_intent_f1#12 / 200.725Source ↗official
AIRBench 2024 Safety Scenariossafety_scenarios#77 / 800.326Source ↗official
ChineseSafescore#20 / 2242.99Source ↗official
COMPL-AI AI-Identity Disclosurescore#4 / 140.9932Source ↗official
COMPL-AI LLM RuLES Multi-Turn Rule Followingscore#14 / 140.1723Source ↗official
COMPL-AI TensorTrust Goal-Hijacking Resistancescore#13 / 130.3022Source ↗official
Contextual MoralChoicehuman_agreement#16 / 220.35Source ↗official
DSPSafeBenchscore#6 / 1273.04Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#40 / 24836.61Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#151 / 24886.39Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#235 / 24831.3Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#163 / 24694.65Source ↗official
HarmBenchdr#24 / 2846.3Source ↗official
HELM Safetyanthropic_red_team#79 / 800.806Source ↗official
HELM Safetybbq#78 / 800.6165Source ↗official
HELM Safetyharmbench#79 / 800.2885Source ↗official
HELM Safetysimple_safety_tests#79 / 800.6215Source ↗official
HELM Safetyxstest#77 / 800.8065Source ↗official
JailBenchjailbreak_success_rate#14 / 1478.14Source ↗official
Large-scale Moral Machine experiment on LLMshuman_choice_distance#14 / 390.9189Source ↗official
MedSafetyBenchmedical_safety_score#13 / 3083.81Source ↗official
Microsoft Phi Safety Panelsharmful_continuation#9 / 100.026Source ↗official
Microsoft Phi Safety Panelsharmful_summarization#10 / 100.223Source ↗official
Microsoft Phi Safety Panelsjailbreak#9 / 100.156Source ↗official
Microsoft Phi Safety Panelsthird_party_harm#9 / 100.562Source ↗official
NESSiE Necessary Safety Benchmarksh_score#15 / 1628.21Source ↗official
S-Evalbase_en_overall#22 / 2234.2Source ↗official
SafeDialBenchaggression#13 / 187.027Source ↗official
SafeDialBenchethics#8 / 187.587Source ↗official
SafeDialBenchfairness#13 / 187.187Source ↗official
SafeDialBenchlegality#3 / 187.993Source ↗official
SafeDialBenchmorality#7 / 187.28Source ↗official
SafeDialBenchprivacy#6 / 187.607Source ↗official
SALAD-Benchattack_enhanced_human_autonomy_integrity#28 / 336.035Source ↗official
SALAD-Benchattack_enhanced_information_safety_harms#32 / 333.095Source ↗official
SALAD-Benchattack_enhanced_malicious_use#29 / 334.65Source ↗official
SALAD-Benchattack_enhanced_misinformation_harms#32 / 334.11Source ↗official
SALAD-Benchattack_enhanced_representation_toxicity#29 / 334.09Source ↗official
SALAD-Benchattack_enhanced_socioeconomic_harms#31 / 335.41Source ↗official
SALAD-Benchbase_human_autonomy_integrity#30 / 3367.21Source ↗official
SALAD-Benchbase_information_safety_harms#29 / 3378.74Source ↗official
SALAD-Benchbase_malicious_use#29 / 3357.35Source ↗official
SALAD-Benchbase_misinformation_harms#29 / 3375.97Source ↗official
SALAD-Benchbase_representation_toxicity#29 / 3374.01Source ↗official
SALAD-Benchbase_socioeconomic_harms#29 / 3374.14Source ↗official
SALAD-Benchmcq_human_autonomy_integrity#18 / 3332.92Source ↗official
SALAD-Benchmcq_information_safety_harms#17 / 3332.5Source ↗official
SALAD-Benchmcq_malicious_use#17 / 3334.36Source ↗official
SALAD-Benchmcq_misinformation_harms#17 / 3334.76Source ↗official
SALAD-Benchmcq_representation_toxicity#17 / 3331.3Source ↗official
SALAD-Benchmcq_socioeconomic_harms#17 / 3331.94Source ↗official
SORRY-Benchavg#48 / 510.785Source ↗official
SuperCLUE Safetyinstruction_attack#17 / 3162.07Source ↗official
SuperCLUE Safetyresponsible_ai#18 / 3154.55Source ↗official
SuperCLUE Safetytraditional_safety#25 / 3168.09Source ↗official
VETO Misfired Alignmentmisfired_alignment_rate_pct#6 / 255.7Source ↗official
XSTestsafe_full_compliance_rate#1 / 30.984Source ↗official
XSTestunsafe_full_refusal_rate#3 / 30.235Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AIRBench 2024 Safety Scenariossafety_scenarios#4 / 800.326Source ↗official
COMPL-AI LLM RuLES Multi-Turn Rule Followingscore#1 / 140.1723Source ↗official
DSPSafeBenchscore#7 / 1273.04Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#98 / 24886.39Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#14 / 24831.3Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#84 / 24694.65Source ↗official
HarmBenchdr#5 / 2846.3Source ↗official
HELM Safetyanthropic_red_team#2 / 800.806Source ↗official
HELM Safetyharmbench#2 / 800.2885Source ↗official
HELM Safetysimple_safety_tests#2 / 800.6215Source ↗official
HELM Safetyxstest#77 / 800.8065Source ↗official
JailBenchjailbreak_success_rate#1 / 1478.14Source ↗official
MedSafetyBenchmedical_safety_score#18 / 3083.81Source ↗official
Microsoft Phi Safety Panelsharmful_continuation#2 / 100.026Source ↗official
Microsoft Phi Safety Panelsharmful_summarization#1 / 100.223Source ↗official
Microsoft Phi Safety Panelsjailbreak#2 / 100.156Source ↗official
Microsoft Phi Safety Panelsthird_party_harm#2 / 100.562Source ↗official
S-Evalbase_en_overall#1 / 2234.2Source ↗official
SafeDialBenchaggression#6 / 187.027Source ↗official
SafeDialBenchethics#11 / 187.587Source ↗official
SafeDialBenchfairness#5 / 187.187Source ↗official
SafeDialBenchlegality#16 / 187.993Source ↗official
SafeDialBenchmorality#12 / 187.28Source ↗official
SafeDialBenchprivacy#13 / 187.607Source ↗official
SALAD-Benchattack_enhanced_human_autonomy_integrity#6 / 336.035Source ↗official
SALAD-Benchattack_enhanced_information_safety_harms#2 / 333.095Source ↗official
SALAD-Benchattack_enhanced_malicious_use#5 / 334.65Source ↗official
SALAD-Benchattack_enhanced_misinformation_harms#2 / 334.11Source ↗official
SALAD-Benchattack_enhanced_representation_toxicity#5 / 334.09Source ↗official
SALAD-Benchattack_enhanced_socioeconomic_harms#3 / 335.41Source ↗official
SALAD-Benchbase_human_autonomy_integrity#4 / 3367.21Source ↗official
SALAD-Benchbase_information_safety_harms#5 / 3378.74Source ↗official
SALAD-Benchbase_malicious_use#5 / 3357.35Source ↗official
SALAD-Benchbase_misinformation_harms#5 / 3375.97Source ↗official
SALAD-Benchbase_representation_toxicity#5 / 3374.01Source ↗official
SALAD-Benchbase_socioeconomic_harms#5 / 3374.14Source ↗official
SORRY-Benchavg#4 / 510.785Source ↗official
SpeechMap model completioncomplete_pct#36 / 18178.3Source ↗official
SuperCLUE Safetyinstruction_attack#13 / 3162.07Source ↗official
SuperCLUE Safetytraditional_safety#5 / 3168.09Source ↗official
VETO Misfired Alignmentmisfired_alignment_rate_pct#6 / 255.7Source ↗official
XSTestsafe_full_compliance_rate#1 / 30.984Source ↗official
XSTestunsafe_full_refusal_rate#1 / 30.235Source ↗official