← Models

Model profile

Minimax M3

MiniMaxdeveloper
2026-06-02release date
#48 / 305overall rank
7eval lineages
2discovery sources

Evidence summary

Minimax M3 has an estimated overall rank of #48; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #18–#176. Its behavior-only rank is #47; company governance moves the combined estimate to #48. Published evidence spans 7 evals and 5 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is AA-Omniscience (hallucination_rate, #6 of 327); its weakest is SpeciEval (speciesism, #84 of 105).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Published eval results

Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#6 / 3270.1843Source ↗official
Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating#85 / 1121419.0Source ↗official
BullshitBench v2clear_pushback_rate#15 / 1060.625Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbasaglia_score#10 / 5037.07Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbaudrillard_score#9 / 5033.03Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchhuxley_score#9 / 5033.03Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchlaguardia_score#13 / 5054.27Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchorwell_score#10 / 5036Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchpetrov_score#14 / 5050.7Source ↗official
SM-Benchadversarial#57 / 7879.02Source ↗official
SM-Benchambiguous_interpretation#29 / 7887.5Source ↗official
SM-Benchanti_hallucination#25 / 7896.34Source ↗official
SM-Bencheq_boundaries#56 / 7857.87Source ↗official
SM-Benchoverfit#29 / 7879.23Source ↗official
SpeciEvalbelief_animal_sentience#78 / 1056.56Source ↗official
SpeciEvalland_animal_4ns#12 / 1054.2Source ↗official
SpeciEvalsea_animal_4ns#14 / 1054.4Source ↗official
SpeciEvalspeciesism#84 / 1052.52Source ↗official
TACbase_welfare_rate#45 / 7424.36Source ↗self run

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

CCPBench political narrative alignment

DimensionValueDistribution
CCP-narrative alignment — all questions1.12
CCP-narrative alignment — China topics1.14
CCP-narrative alignment — non-China controls1.06