← Models

Model profile

MiniMax M3

MiniMaxdeveloper
2026-06-02release date
#61 / 333Safety rank
#531 / 645Freedom rank
1discovery sources

Evidence summary

Safety. MiniMax M3 has an estimated Safety rank of #61; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #58–#166. Its behavior-only rank is #57; company governance moves the combined estimate to #61. Published Safety evidence spans 10 eval lineages and 6 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is AA-Omniscience (hallucination_rate, #8 of 345); its weakest is Concordia — FRT-SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQA (safety_score, #42 of 45).

Freedom. MiniMax M3 has an estimated Freedom rank of #531; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #303–#642. Published Freedom evidence spans 3 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Concordia — FRT-SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQA (safety_score, #2 of 45); its weakest is SpeechMap model completion (complete_pct, #174 of 181).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Finetunes

Direct finetunes linked to this canonical base model. Quantized and repackaged derivatives are excluded.

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#8 / 3450.1843Source ↗official
ANIMAscore#12 / 220.6988Source ↗self run
Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating#84 / 1111419.0Source ↗official
BullshitBench v2clear_pushback_rate#18 / 1170.635Source ↗official
Concordia — Agentic-Misalignmentsafety_score#11 / 5498.5Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-Deceptionsafety_score#4 / 6397.78Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-Manipulationsafety_score#7 / 5699.33Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-SecurityRiskssafety_score#12 / 6398.87Source ↗official
Concordia — APEsafety_score#19 / 5543.96Source ↗official
Concordia — CyberSecEval2-PromptInjectionsafety_score#23 / 6389.24Source ↗official
Concordia — DarkBenchsafety_score#7 / 5568.79Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Biologicalsafety_score#20 / 5473.5Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Chemicalsafety_score#22 / 5463.49Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Privacy/Scamssafety_score#17 / 5472Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-AirBench-Manipulationsafety_score#5 / 4558.56Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-AirBench-SecurityRiskssafety_score#6 / 4548.67Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#42 / 450.3333Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-SOSBench-Chemsafety_score#19 / 4562Source ↗official
Concordia — MASKsafety_score#12 / 6281.55Source ↗official
Concordia — SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#50 / 6359.6Source ↗official
Concordia — SciKnowEval-ChemicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#48 / 639.272Source ↗official
Concordia — Shutdown-Resistancesafety_score#38 / 5395Source ↗official
Concordia — SOSBench-Biosafety_score#5 / 6399Source ↗official
Concordia — SOSBench-Chemsafety_score#22 / 6390.8Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbasaglia_score#10 / 5037.07Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbaudrillard_score#9 / 5033.03Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchhuxley_score#9 / 5033.03Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchlaguardia_score#13 / 5054.27Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchorwell_score#10 / 5036Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchpetrov_score#14 / 5050.7Source ↗official
Opposite-Narrator Sycophancysycophancy_rate_pct#14 / 243.6Source ↗official
SM-Benchadversarial#63 / 8479.02Source ↗official
SM-Benchambiguous_interpretation#34 / 8487.5Source ↗official
SM-Benchanti_hallucination#29 / 8496.34Source ↗official
SM-Bencheq_boundaries#62 / 8457.87Source ↗official
SM-Benchoverfit#35 / 8479.23Source ↗official
SpeciEvalbelief_animal_sentience#93 / 1236.56Source ↗official
SpeciEvalland_animal_4ns#16 / 1234.2Source ↗official
SpeciEvalsea_animal_4ns#18 / 1234.4Source ↗official
SpeciEvalspeciesism#98 / 1232.52Source ↗official
TACbase_welfare_rate#52 / 8724.36Source ↗self run

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Concordia — AirBench-Deceptionsafety_score#59 / 6397.78Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-Manipulationsafety_score#50 / 5699.33Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-PoliticalPersuasionsafety_score#44 / 5681.43Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-SecurityRiskssafety_score#50 / 6398.87Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Biologicalsafety_score#35 / 5473.5Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Chemicalsafety_score#33 / 5463.49Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Privacy/Scamssafety_score#38 / 5472Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-AirBench-Manipulationsafety_score#41 / 4558.56Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-AirBench-SecurityRiskssafety_score#40 / 4548.67Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#2 / 450.3333Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-SOSBench-Chemsafety_score#27 / 4562Source ↗official
Concordia — SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#14 / 6359.6Source ↗official
Concordia — SciKnowEval-ChemicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#16 / 639.272Source ↗official
Concordia — SOSBench-Biosafety_score#59 / 6399Source ↗official
Concordia — SOSBench-Chemsafety_score#41 / 6390.8Source ↗official
SM-Benchadversarial#20 / 8479.02Source ↗official
SM-Bencheq_boundaries#62 / 8457.87Source ↗official
SM-Benchoverfit#35 / 8479.23Source ↗official
SpeechMap model completioncomplete_pct#174 / 18127Source ↗official

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

CCPBench political narrative alignment

DimensionValueDistribution
CCP-narrative alignment — all questions1.12
CCP-narrative alignment — China topics1.14
CCP-narrative alignment — non-China controls1.06