Model profile
Mimo V2.5 Pro
Evidence summary
Mimo V2.5 Pro has an estimated overall rank of #46; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #6–#183. Its behavior-only rank is #45; company governance moves the combined estimate to #46. Published evidence spans 6 evals and 5 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is AA-Omniscience (hallucination_rate, #10 of 328); its weakest is TAC (base_welfare_rate, #54 of 76).
Compare this model
Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.
Official and reference links
- Artificial Analysis ↗mimo-v2-5-pro
- Hugging Face ↗XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- OpenRouter ↗xiaomi/mimo-v2.5-pro
- Official model page ↗Exact model document · Reviewed official Hugging Face owner · official repository
- Release source ↗direct research preview identity date
- mimo.xiaomi.com ↗
Published eval results
Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate | #10 / 328 | ↓0.247 | Source ↗official | |
| Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating | #39 / 112 | ↑1445.0 | Source ↗official | |
| BullshitBench v2clear_pushback_rate | #21 / 106 | ↑0.5 | Source ↗official | |
| DystopiaBenchbasaglia_score | #8 / 50 | ↓33.37 | Source ↗official | |
| DystopiaBenchbaudrillard_score | #20 / 50 | ↓51.07 | Source ↗official | |
| DystopiaBenchhuxley_score | #7 / 50 | ↓26.03 | Source ↗official | |
| DystopiaBenchlaguardia_score | #5 / 50 | ↓37.03 | Source ↗official | |
| DystopiaBenchorwell_score | #6 / 50 | ↓26.03 | Source ↗official | |
| DystopiaBenchpetrov_score | #10 / 50 | ↓42.53 | Source ↗official | |
| SM-Benchadversarial | #30 / 79 | ↑83.41 | Source ↗official | |
| SM-Benchambiguous_interpretation | #34 / 79 | ↑86.61 | Source ↗official | |
| SM-Benchanti_hallucination | #14 / 79 | ↑98.43 | Source ↗official | |
| SM-Bencheq_boundaries | #28 / 79 | ↑67.98 | Source ↗official | |
| SM-Benchoverfit | #17 / 79 | ↑85.79 | Source ↗official | |
| TACbase_welfare_rate | #54 / 76 | ↑23.7 | Source ↗self run |
Values evaluations
Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.