Model profile
Mimo V2 Flash
Evidence summary
Mimo V2 Flash has an estimated overall rank of #157; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #45–#222. Its behavior-only rank is #158; company governance moves the combined estimate to #157. Published evidence spans 4 evals and 5 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is LiveSecBench (ethics, #6 of 43); its weakest is SM-Bench (overfit, #72 of 73).
Compare this model
Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.
Official and reference links
- Artificial Analysis ↗mimo-v2-flash
- Hugging Face ↗XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2-Flash
- OpenRouter ↗xiaomi/mimo-v2-flash
- Official model page ↗Exact model document · Reviewed official Hugging Face owner · official repository
- Release source ↗direct research preview identity date
Published eval results
Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Better | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate | #46 / 311 | 0.4839 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| BullshitBench v2clear_pushback_rate | #75 / 105 | 0.145 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| LiveSecBenchethics | #6 / 43 | 80.99 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| LiveSecBenchfactuality | #19 / 43 | 52.77 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| LiveSecBenchlegality | #18 / 43 | 52.92 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| LiveSecBenchprivacy | #22 / 43 | 53.69 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| LiveSecBenchpsychological_health | #26 / 43 | 45.77 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| SM-Benchadversarial | #64 / 73 | 73.66 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| SM-Benchambiguous_interpretation | #50 / 73 | 81.85 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| SM-Benchanti_hallucination | #62 / 73 | 80.63 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| SM-Bencheq_boundaries | #40 / 73 | 63.2 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| SM-Benchoverfit | #72 / 73 | 12.84 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official |
Values evaluations
Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.