← Models

Model profile

Llama 4 Maverick

Metadeveloper
2025-04-05release date
#188 / 333Safety rank
#253 / 645Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. Llama 4 Maverick has an estimated Safety rank of #188; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #135–#252. Its behavior-only rank is #185; company governance moves the combined estimate to #188. Published Safety evidence spans 36 eval lineages and 7 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Concordia — Shutdown-Resistance (safety_score, #1 of 53); its weakest is The Dictatorship Eval (overall_resistance_rate, #20 of 20).

Freedom. Llama 4 Maverick has an estimated Freedom rank of #253; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #171–#363. Published Freedom evidence spans 20 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Human Pathogen Capabilities Test (HPCT) — overall refusal (refusal_rate_pct, #1 of 69); its weakest is SOSBench (medicine_pvr, #18 of 23).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#257 / 3450.8888Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5child_sexual_exploitation#20 / 3153.2Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5defamation#15 / 3166.7Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5hate#16 / 3152.2Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5indiscriminate_weapons_cbrne#20 / 3180Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5intellectual_property#17 / 3159.6Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5non_violent_crimes#14 / 3177.8Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5privacy#15 / 3166.7Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sex_related_crimes#19 / 3173.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sexual_content#18 / 3151.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5specialized_advice#13 / 3160.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5suicide_self_harm#14 / 3158.3Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5violent_crimes#19 / 3176.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Poetry — AILuminate Baseline and Poetry ASRbaseline_asr#10 / 245.14Source ↗official
Adversarial Poetry — AILuminate Baseline and Poetry ASRpoetry_asr#11 / 2443.44Source ↗official
AgentDrive Safety Compliancescr#30 / 4875Source ↗official
AIRBench 2024 Safety Scenariossafety_scenarios#37 / 800.686Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardcorrigibility#15 / 244.175Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardhonesty#14 / 243.581Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardnon_manipulation#17 / 243.084Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardrobustness#9 / 243.867Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardsafety#18 / 243.567Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardscheming#19 / 243.422Source ↗official
Anthropic Agentic Misalignment — blackmailmisaligned_action_rate_pct#1 / 160Source ↗official
Anthropic Agentic Misalignment — corporate espionagemisaligned_action_rate_pct#7 / 1644Source ↗official
BullshitBench v2clear_pushback_rate#65 / 1170.29Source ↗official
Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate#72 / 10456.23Source ↗official
Concordia — Agentic-Misalignmentsafety_score#38 / 5466.17Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-Deceptionsafety_score#42 / 6374.07Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-Manipulationsafety_score#46 / 5673.33Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-SecurityRiskssafety_score#43 / 6383.78Source ↗official
Concordia — APEsafety_score#39 / 559.635Source ↗official
Concordia — CyberSecEval2-PromptInjectionsafety_score#55 / 6370.52Source ↗official
Concordia — DarkBenchsafety_score#18 / 5560.03Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Biologicalsafety_score#31 / 5447.7Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Chemicalsafety_score#29 / 5451.89Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Privacy/Scamssafety_score#26 / 5462.38Source ↗official
Concordia — MASKsafety_score#34 / 6258.22Source ↗official
Concordia — SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#25 / 6386.53Source ↗official
Concordia — SciKnowEval-ChemicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#40 / 6315.86Source ↗official
Concordia — Shutdown-Resistancesafety_score#1 / 53100Source ↗official
Concordia — SOSBench-Biosafety_score#41 / 6372.2Source ↗official
Concordia — SOSBench-Chemsafety_score#42 / 6379.2Source ↗official
Confabulationsconfabulation_rate#34 / 5228.22Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbasaglia_score#27 / 5064.93Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbaudrillard_score#36 / 5065.83Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchhuxley_score#27 / 5072.8Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchlaguardia_score#25 / 5066.73Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchorwell_score#23 / 5068.6Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchpetrov_score#18 / 5068.63Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#212 / 24810.34Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#62 / 24891.17Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#86 / 24882.22Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#84 / 24697.82Source ↗official
FORTRESSaverage_risk_score#29 / 5040.09Source ↗official
FORTRESSover_refusal_score#26 / 494.95Source ↗official
HELM Safetyanthropic_red_team#54 / 800.982Source ↗official
HELM Safetybbq#43 / 800.93Source ↗official
HELM Safetyharmbench#52 / 800.661Source ↗official
HELM Safetysimple_safety_tests#29 / 800.993Source ↗official
HELM Safetyxstest#32 / 800.965Source ↗official
HUMAINE Trust, Ethics and Safetytrust_ethics_safety_score#50 / 5423.02Source ↗official
Human Pathogen Capabilities Test (HPCT) — overall refusalrefusal_rate_pct#27 / 690Source ↗official
Humanity's Last Exam RMS calibration error (Scale Labs)calibrationError#35 / 4283Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchethics#37 / 4322.55Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchfactuality#35 / 4329.74Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchlegality#30 / 4327.05Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchprivacy#35 / 4326.17Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchpsychological_health#29 / 4335.37Source ↗official
Manager Coercion Benchcoercion_ladder_depth#18 / 378.333Source ↗self run
MASKlying_probability_pct#41 / 5350.27Source ↗official
MT-JailBench CrescendoXsafety_score#10 / 2122.64Source ↗official
ODCV-Benchaverage_severity#10 / 121.682Source ↗official
ODCV-Benchmisalignment_rate#2 / 1216.22Source ↗official
PHAREbias_resistance_diagnostic#5 / 660.7365Source ↗official
PHAREhallucination_resistance_diagnostic#43 / 700.7147Source ↗official
PHAREharm_resistance_diagnostic#53 / 700.8925Source ↗official
PHAREjailbreak_resistance_diagnostic#34 / 670.4899Source ↗official
Shelleducation_jsr#10 / 140.696Source ↗official
Shellfinance_jsr#11 / 140.716Source ↗official
Shellmanagement_jsr#11 / 140.844Source ↗official
SOSBenchbiology_pvr#7 / 230.288Source ↗official
SOSBenchchemistry_pvr#7 / 230.238Source ↗official
SOSBenchmedicine_pvr#6 / 230.426Source ↗official
SOSBenchpharmacology_pvr#8 / 230.652Source ↗official
SOSBenchphysics_pvr#8 / 230.24Source ↗official
SOSBenchpsychology_pvr#6 / 230.242Source ↗official
SpeciesismBenchexplicit_speciesism_scale#7 / 73.3Source ↗official
SpeciesismBenchmorally_wrong_rate#2 / 842.67Source ↗official
SpeciesismBenchspeciesism_recognition_rate#4 / 888.97Source ↗official
SpeciEvalbelief_animal_sentience#25 / 1236.97Source ↗official
SpeciEvalland_animal_4ns#86 / 1234.72Source ↗official
SpeciEvalsea_animal_4ns#88 / 1234.9Source ↗official
SpeciEvalspeciesism#107 / 1232.65Source ↗official
The Dictatorship Evaloverall_resistance_rate#20 / 200Source ↗official
TrustLLM contemporary collapsed applicationtrustllm#7 / 80.6Source ↗official
TukaBenchafri_jbb_cultural_asr#4 / 622.4Source ↗official
TukaBenchafri_jbb_harm_asr#4 / 616.9Source ↗official
TukaBenchafrijail_mono_asr#4 / 622Source ↗official
Vectara HHEM Factual Consistencyfactual_consistency_rate#36 / 9491.8Source ↗official
Vigil Mental Health Safetyoverall_score#19 / 2328Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5child_sexual_exploitation#12 / 3153.2Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5defamation#16 / 3166.7Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5hate#16 / 3152.2Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5indiscriminate_weapons_cbrne#10 / 3180Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5intellectual_property#15 / 3159.6Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5non_violent_crimes#18 / 3177.8Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5privacy#17 / 3166.7Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sex_related_crimes#12 / 3173.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sexual_content#14 / 3151.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5specialized_advice#19 / 3160.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5suicide_self_harm#17 / 3158.3Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5violent_crimes#12 / 3176.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Poetry — AILuminate Baseline and Poetry ASRbaseline_asr#15 / 245.14Source ↗official
Adversarial Poetry — AILuminate Baseline and Poetry ASRpoetry_asr#14 / 2443.44Source ↗official
AIRBench 2024 Safety Scenariossafety_scenarios#44 / 800.686Source ↗official
Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate#33 / 10456.23Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-Deceptionsafety_score#22 / 6374.07Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-Manipulationsafety_score#11 / 5673.33Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-PoliticalPersuasionsafety_score#26 / 5658.57Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-SecurityRiskssafety_score#20 / 6383.78Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Biologicalsafety_score#24 / 5447.7Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Chemicalsafety_score#26 / 5451.89Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Privacy/Scamssafety_score#29 / 5462.38Source ↗official
Concordia — SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#39 / 6386.53Source ↗official
Concordia — SciKnowEval-ChemicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#24 / 6315.86Source ↗official
Concordia — SOSBench-Biosafety_score#23 / 6372.2Source ↗official
Concordia — SOSBench-Chemsafety_score#22 / 6379.2Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#184 / 24891.17Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#162 / 24882.22Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#162 / 24697.82Source ↗official
FORTRESSaverage_risk_score#22 / 5040.09Source ↗official
FORTRESSover_refusal_score#26 / 494.95Source ↗official
HELM Safetyanthropic_red_team#25 / 800.982Source ↗official
HELM Safetyharmbench#29 / 800.661Source ↗official
HELM Safetysimple_safety_tests#50 / 800.993Source ↗official
HELM Safetyxstest#32 / 800.965Source ↗official
Human Pathogen Capabilities Test (HPCT) — overall refusalrefusal_rate_pct#1 / 690Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchethics#7 / 4322.55Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchlegality#14 / 4327.05Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchprivacy#9 / 4326.17Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchpsychological_health#15 / 4335.37Source ↗official
MT-JailBench CrescendoXsafety_score#12 / 2122.64Source ↗official
PHAREharm_resistance_diagnostic#18 / 700.8925Source ↗official
PHAREjailbreak_resistance_diagnostic#34 / 670.4899Source ↗official
Shelleducation_jsr#5 / 140.696Source ↗official
Shellfinance_jsr#4 / 140.716Source ↗official
Shellmanagement_jsr#4 / 140.844Source ↗official
SOSBenchbiology_pvr#17 / 230.288Source ↗official
SOSBenchchemistry_pvr#17 / 230.238Source ↗official
SOSBenchmedicine_pvr#18 / 230.426Source ↗official
SOSBenchpharmacology_pvr#16 / 230.652Source ↗official
SOSBenchphysics_pvr#16 / 230.24Source ↗official
SOSBenchpsychology_pvr#18 / 230.242Source ↗official
SpeechMap model completioncomplete_pct#93 / 18158.3Source ↗official
TukaBenchafri_jbb_cultural_asr#3 / 622.4Source ↗official
TukaBenchafri_jbb_harm_asr#2 / 616.9Source ↗official
TukaBenchafrijail_mono_asr#3 / 622Source ↗official
UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingnesswillingness_adherence_score#25 / 1566Source ↗official
UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingnesswillingness_direct_score#113 / 1562Source ↗official
Vigil Mental Health Safetyoverall_score#4 / 2328Source ↗official

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

UGI Political Values

DimensionValueDistribution
Political Lean-18.6
Government50.1
Diplomacy65.8
Economy45.3
Society62.8

The Economist World Values Survey Cultural Map

DimensionValueDistribution
Survival ↔ Self-expression1.75
Traditional ↔ Secular0.154