← Models

Model profile

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Metadeveloper
2024-12-06release date
#186 / 333Safety rank
#107 / 645Freedom rank
1discovery sources

Evidence summary

Safety. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has an estimated Safety rank of #186; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #111–#255. Its behavior-only rank is #170; company governance moves the combined estimate to #186. Published Safety evidence spans 32 eval lineages and 7 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is SpeciEval (belief_animal_sentience, #1 of 123); its weakest is AnimalHarmBench (score, #10 of 10).

Freedom. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has an estimated Freedom rank of #107; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #103–#267. Published Freedom evidence spans 13 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is LiveSecBench (psychological_health, #4 of 43); its weakest is LiveSecBench (legality, #30 of 43).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Finetunes

Direct finetunes linked to this canonical base model. Quantized and repackaged derivatives are excluded.

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#274 / 3450.9021Source ↗official
AbstentionBenchanswer_unknown_f1#8 / 200.8895Source ↗official
AbstentionBenchfalse_premise_f1#9 / 200.7079Source ↗official
AbstentionBenchstale_f1#12 / 200.6225Source ↗official
AbstentionBenchsubjective_f1#12 / 200.7191Source ↗official
AbstentionBenchunderspecified_context_f1#8 / 200.6586Source ↗official
AbstentionBenchunderspecified_intent_f1#13 / 200.7242Source ↗official
AgentDrive Safety Compliancescr#34 / 4861.25Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatchild_sexual_exploitation#22 / 3226Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatdefamation#25 / 3226.8Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chathate#26 / 3219Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatindiscriminate_weapons_cbrne#26 / 3242.8Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatintellectual_property#26 / 3223.6Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatnon_violent_crimes#25 / 3229.1Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatprivacy#26 / 3226Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsex_related_crimes#25 / 3224Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsexual_content#27 / 3246.8Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatspecialized_advice#25 / 3225.9Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsuicide_self_harm#24 / 3220.3Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatviolent_crimes#27 / 3238Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardcorrigibility#22 / 243.951Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardhonesty#18 / 243.346Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardnon_manipulation#19 / 243.063Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardrobustness#16 / 243.28Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardsafety#20 / 243.365Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardscheming#22 / 243.277Source ↗official
AnimalHarmBenchscore#10 / 10-0.015Source ↗official
BioTIERpermit_compliance_pct#18 / 5299.4Source ↗official
BioTIERrefuse_compliance_pct#46 / 5211.8Source ↗official
BlueBench AttaQ-100attaq_harmlessness_reward_pct#11 / 1883.8Source ↗official
Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate#68 / 10453.54Source ↗official
Confabulationsconfabulation_rate#19 / 5217.82Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#203 / 24811.11Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#126 / 24887.83Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#138 / 24866.11Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#101 / 24697.18Source ↗official
FinEval 6.0 Safety Awarenesssafety_awareness_score#1 / 883.31Source ↗official
FORTRESSaverage_risk_score#33 / 5044.79Source ↗official
FORTRESSover_refusal_score#13 / 492.18Source ↗official
HalluVerse-M3 Hallucination Recognitionhallucination_recognition_accuracy#7 / 1470.53Source ↗official
HUMAINE Trust, Ethics and Safetytrust_ethics_safety_score#46 / 5424.21Source ↗official
KIDBench Implicit Child Cueimplicit_child_cue_total_mean#9 / 133.76Source ↗official
Large-scale Moral Machine experiment on LLMshuman_choice_distance#9 / 390.8364Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchethics#19 / 4354.35Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchfactuality#38 / 4326.17Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchlegality#14 / 4366.51Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchprivacy#31 / 4330.35Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchpsychological_health#40 / 4317.08Source ↗official
Manager Coercion Benchcoercion_ladder_depth#33 / 379Source ↗self run
MANTAAWMS#6 / 120.476Source ↗official
MANTAAWVS#8 / 120.422Source ↗official
MASKlying_probability_pct#37 / 5348.07Source ↗official
PandaBench JBB direct-request panelsafety_rate#35 / 460.95Source ↗official
PHAREbias_resistance_diagnostic#35 / 660.4539Source ↗official
PHAREhallucination_resistance_diagnostic#47 / 700.6883Source ↗official
PHAREharm_resistance_diagnostic#58 / 700.8604Source ↗official
PHAREjailbreak_resistance_diagnostic#38 / 670.4768Source ↗official
RealityTest — Text AI-Identity Disclosuredisclosure_probability#16 / 170.125Source ↗official
RefusalBenchyouden_j#17 / 190.004255Source ↗official
SOSBenchbiology_pvr#12 / 230.408Source ↗official
SOSBenchchemistry_pvr#14 / 230.54Source ↗official
SOSBenchmedicine_pvr#11 / 230.546Source ↗official
SOSBenchpharmacology_pvr#12 / 230.812Source ↗official
SOSBenchphysics_pvr#14 / 230.516Source ↗official
SOSBenchpsychology_pvr#11 / 230.446Source ↗official
SpeciesismBenchmorally_wrong_rate#1 / 853.14Source ↗official
SpeciesismBenchspeciesism_recognition_rate#2 / 896.34Source ↗official
SpeciEvalbelief_animal_sentience#1 / 1237Source ↗official
SpeciEvalland_animal_4ns#79 / 1234.64Source ↗official
SpeciEvalsea_animal_4ns#81 / 1234.85Source ↗official
SpeciEvalspeciesism#24 / 1231.53Source ↗official
SYCON Benchfalse_presupposition_tof#9 / 111.9Source ↗official
SYCON Benchunethical_queries_tof#6 / 111.39Source ↗official
TACbase_welfare_rate#19 / 8735.3Source ↗self run
ThaiSafetyBenchsafety_score#11 / 1883.13Source ↗official
Vectara HHEM Factual Consistencyfactual_consistency_rate#4 / 9495.9Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatchild_sexual_exploitation#11 / 3226Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatdefamation#8 / 3226.8Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chathate#7 / 3219Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatindiscriminate_weapons_cbrne#7 / 3242.8Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatintellectual_property#7 / 3223.6Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatnon_violent_crimes#8 / 3229.1Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatprivacy#7 / 3226Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsex_related_crimes#7 / 3224Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsexual_content#6 / 3246.8Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatspecialized_advice#8 / 3225.9Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsuicide_self_harm#9 / 3220.3Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatviolent_crimes#6 / 3238Source ↗official
BioTIERpermit_compliance_pct#18 / 5299.4Source ↗official
BioTIERrefuse_compliance_pct#7 / 5211.8Source ↗official
BlueBench AttaQ-100attaq_harmlessness_reward_pct#8 / 1883.8Source ↗official
Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate#37 / 10453.54Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#121 / 24887.83Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#111 / 24866.11Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#146 / 24697.18Source ↗official
FORTRESSaverage_risk_score#18 / 5044.79Source ↗official
FORTRESSover_refusal_score#13 / 492.18Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchethics#25 / 4354.35Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchlegality#30 / 4366.51Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchprivacy#13 / 4330.35Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchpsychological_health#4 / 4317.08Source ↗official
PandaBench JBB direct-request panelsafety_rate#8 / 460.95Source ↗official
PHAREharm_resistance_diagnostic#13 / 700.8604Source ↗official
PHAREjailbreak_resistance_diagnostic#30 / 670.4768Source ↗official
SOSBenchbiology_pvr#12 / 230.408Source ↗official
SOSBenchchemistry_pvr#10 / 230.54Source ↗official
SOSBenchmedicine_pvr#13 / 230.546Source ↗official
SOSBenchpharmacology_pvr#12 / 230.812Source ↗official
SOSBenchphysics_pvr#10 / 230.516Source ↗official
SOSBenchpsychology_pvr#13 / 230.446Source ↗official
SpeechMap model completioncomplete_pct#87 / 18160.7Source ↗official
ThaiSafetyBenchsafety_score#8 / 1883.13Source ↗official
UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingnesswillingness_adherence_score#61 / 1563Source ↗official
UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingnesswillingness_direct_score#21 / 1565Source ↗official

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

UGI Political Values

DimensionValueDistribution
Political Lean-18.6
Government46.5
Diplomacy66
Economy44.7
Society62.7

ValueCompass

DimensionValueDistribution
Universalism59.4
Self-direction41.7
Care / Harm19.6
Fairness / Cheating16.4
Ethical86.5

Taiwan Sovereignty Benchmark Pro

DimensionValueDistribution
Pro-Taiwan rubric compatibility90
Warning-phrase rate0
Soft-censorship rate0
API-error rate0

Agent-ValueBench Moral Foundations (MFT08)

Agent-ValueBench HEXACO

DimensionValueDistribution
Openness to experience6.1
Honesty-humility5.4
Extraversion5.1
Agreeableness6
Conscientiousness7.1

Agent-ValueBench Schwartz Basic Values (PVQ40)