Model profile
Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B Vision
Evidence summary
Safety. Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B Vision has an estimated Safety rank of #212; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #125–#313. Its behavior-only rank is #200; company governance moves the combined estimate to #212. Published Safety evidence spans 3 eval lineages and 4 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (toxicity_attack_non_success_rate, #51 of 270); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (bias_attack_non_success_rate, #182 of 272).
Freedom. Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B Vision has an estimated Freedom rank of #469; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #221–#627. Published Freedom evidence spans 2 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboard (single_turn_attack_success_rate, #44 of 104); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (toxicity_attack_non_success_rate, #219 of 270).
Compare this model
Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.
Official and reference links
- Artificial Analysis ↗llama-3-2-instruct-11b-vision
- Official model page ↗Family-level model document · meta · first party
- Release source ↗curated outward evidence
Safety evals
Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate | #200 / 361 | ↓0.8188 | Source ↗official | |
| Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate | #61 / 104 | ↓49.05 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate | #182 / 272 | ↑13.18 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate | #67 / 272 | ↑90.83 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate | #94 / 272 | ↑85.56 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate | #51 / 270 | ↑98.55 | Source ↗official |
Freedom evals
Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate | #44 / 104 | ↑49.05 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate | #202 / 272 | ↓90.83 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate | #175 / 272 | ↓85.56 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate | #219 / 270 | ↓98.55 | Source ↗official |