Model profile
Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B Vision
Metadeveloper
#171 / 312overall rank
3eval lineages
Evidence summary
Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B Vision has an estimated overall rank of #171; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #77–#256. Its behavior-only rank is #179; company governance moves the combined estimate to #171. Published evidence spans 3 evals and 4 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (toxicity_attack_non_success_rate, #50 of 239); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (bias_attack_non_success_rate, #156 of 241).
Compare this model
Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.
Official and reference links
- Artificial Analysis ↗llama-3-2-instruct-11b-vision
- Official model page ↗Family-level model document · meta · first party
Published eval results
Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate | #168 / 330 | ↓0.8188 | Source ↗official | |
| Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate | #61 / 104 | ↓49.05 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate | #156 / 241 | ↑13.18 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate | #67 / 241 | ↑90.83 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate | #64 / 241 | ↑85.56 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate | #50 / 239 | ↑98.55 | Source ↗official |