Model profile
Evidence summary
Safety. Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct has an estimated Safety rank of #217; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #37–#309. Its behavior-only rank is #203; company governance moves the combined estimate to #217. Published Safety evidence spans 4 eval lineages and 4 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (bias_attack_non_success_rate, #14 of 248); its weakest is MASK (lying_probability_pct, #36 of 53).
Freedom. Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct has an estimated Freedom rank of #395; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #190–#548. Published Freedom evidence spans 3 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboard (single_turn_attack_success_rate, #36 of 104); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #194 of 248).
Compare this model
Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.
Official and reference links
- Hugging Face ↗meta-llama/Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct
- NVIDIA ↗qc69jvmznzxy/llama-3.2-90b-vision-instruct
- OpenRouter ↗meta-llama/llama-3.2-90b-vision-instruct
- Official model page ↗Exact model document · Reviewed official Hugging Face owner · official repository
- Release source ↗repository created at proxy
Safety evals
Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate | #69 / 104 | ↓53.94 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate | #14 / 248 | ↑52.2 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate | #53 / 248 | ↑91.67 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate | #108 / 248 | ↑75 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate | #81 / 246 | ↑97.86 | Source ↗official | |
| MASKlying_probability_pct | #36 / 53 | ↓45.93 | Source ↗official | |
| SafeArenanormalized_safety_score | #3 / 5 | ↑34 | Source ↗official |
Freedom evals
Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate | #36 / 104 | ↑53.94 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate | #194 / 248 | ↓91.67 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate | #138 / 248 | ↓75 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate | #164 / 246 | ↓97.86 | Source ↗official | |
| SpeechMap model completioncomplete_pct | #84 / 181 | ↑61.6 | Source ↗official |