Model profile
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Metadeveloper
2024-07-23release date
#219 / 267overall rank
25eval lineages
1discovery sources
Evidence summary
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has an estimated overall rank of #219; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #141–#237. Its behavior-only rank is #207; company governance moves the combined estimate to #219. Published evidence spans 25 evals and 7 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is AgentHarm (harm_score, #1 of 12); its weakest is Agent-SafetyBench (leak_sensitive_information, #16 of 16).
Compare this model
Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.
Official and reference links
- Artificial Analysis ↗llama-3-1-instruct-8b
- NVIDIA ↗qc69jvmznzxy/llama-3_1-8b-instruct
- OpenRouter ↗meta-llama/llama-3.1-8b-instruct
- Official model page ↗Family-level model document · meta · first party
- Release source ↗direct research preview identity date
Published eval results
Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Better | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate | #36 / 311 | 0.4177 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| AbstentionBenchanswer_unknown_f1 | #12 / 20 | 0.8667 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| AbstentionBenchfalse_premise_f1 | #14 / 20 | 0.6532 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| AbstentionBenchstale_f1 | #13 / 20 | 0.6218 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| AbstentionBenchsubjective_f1 | #9 / 20 | 0.7449 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| AbstentionBenchunderspecified_context_f1 | #9 / 20 | 0.656 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| AbstentionBenchunderspecified_intent_f1 | #10 / 20 | 0.7338 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| Agent-SafetyBenchcompromise_availability | #16 / 16 | 12.8 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| Agent-SafetyBenchharmful_vulnerable_code | #14 / 16 | 24.8 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| Agent-SafetyBenchleak_sensitive_information | #16 / 16 | 10 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| Agent-SafetyBenchphysical_harm | #16 / 16 | 11.2 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| Agent-SafetyBenchproduce_unsafe_information | #14 / 16 | 74.8 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| Agent-SafetyBenchproperty_loss | #16 / 16 | 12.4 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| Agent-SafetyBenchspread_unsafe_information | #15 / 16 | 6.4 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| Agent-SafetyBenchviolate_law_ethics | #16 / 16 | 6.8 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| AgentHarmharm_score | #1 / 12 | 3.1 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatchild_sexual_exploitation | #15 / 32 | 18.9 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatdefamation | #15 / 32 | 15.8 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| AILuminate General Purpose AI Chathate | #14 / 32 | 7.5 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatindiscriminate_weapons_cbrne | #16 / 32 | 21.9 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatintellectual_property | #18 / 32 | 14.2 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatnon_violent_crimes | #16 / 32 | 16 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatprivacy | #16 / 32 | 12.2 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsex_related_crimes | #13 / 32 | 11.2 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsexual_content | #18 / 32 | 24.1 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatspecialized_advice | #13 / 32 | 14.3 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsuicide_self_harm | #12 / 32 | 10.6 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatviolent_crimes | #15 / 32 | 17.2 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| AIRBench 2024 Safety Scenariossafety_scenarios | #47 / 80 | 0.623 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| BullshitBench v2clear_pushback_rate | #77 / 105 | 0.14 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate | #66 / 105 | 52.74 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| Contextual MoralChoicehuman_agreement | #16 / 22 | 0.35 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| DSPSafeBenchscore | #12 / 12 | 61.51 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate | #105 / 260 | 18.35 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate | #193 / 260 | 83.83 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate | #121 / 260 | 73.33 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate | #230 / 258 | 84.14 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| HELM Safetyanthropic_red_team | #65 / 80 | 0.968 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| HELM Safetybbq | #68 / 80 | 0.785 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| HELM Safetyharmbench | #61 / 80 | 0.616 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| HELM Safetysimple_safety_tests | #40 / 80 | 0.988 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| HELM Safetyxstest | #48 / 80 | 0.953 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| Large-scale Moral Machine experiment on LLMshuman_choice_distance | #37 / 39 | 1.623 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| PandaBench JBB direct-request panelsafety_rate | #25 / 46 | 0.98 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| PHAREbias_resistance_diagnostic | #38 / 66 | 0.4415 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| PHAREhallucination_resistance_diagnostic | #60 / 70 | 0.6381 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| PHAREharm_resistance_diagnostic | #62 / 70 | 0.8306 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| PHAREjailbreak_resistance_diagnostic | #26 / 67 | 0.5881 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| PropensityBenchscore | #10 / 14 | 66.5 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| Shelleducation_jsr | #8 / 14 | 0.658 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| Shellfinance_jsr | #9 / 14 | 0.6 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| Shellmanagement_jsr | #10 / 14 | 0.724 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| SORRY-Benchavg | #12 / 51 | 0.14 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| SYCON Benchfalse_presupposition_tof | #11 / 11 | 1.45 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| SYCON Benchunethical_queries_tof | #10 / 11 | 0.85 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| UAVBench safety-critical decision recognitionethical_safety_critical_accuracy | #24 / 27 | 0.57 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| VETO Misfired Alignmentmisfired_alignment_rate_pct | #7 / 25 | 6.2 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official |
Values evaluations
Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.