← Models

Model profile

Llama 3 8B Instruct

Metadeveloper
2024-04-18release date
#238 / 333Safety rank
#437 / 645Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. Llama 3 8B Instruct has an estimated Safety rank of #238; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #137–#249. Its behavior-only rank is #223; company governance moves the combined estimate to #238. Published Safety evidence spans 16 eval lineages and 7 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Microsoft Phi Safety Panels (harmful_summarization, #1 of 10); its weakest is Contextual MoralChoice (human_agreement, #21 of 22).

Freedom. Llama 3 8B Instruct has an estimated Freedom rank of #437; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #271–#517. Published Freedom evidence spans 13 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #90 of 248); its weakest is Microsoft Phi Safety Panels (harmful_summarization, #10 of 10).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#268 / 3450.8979Source ↗official
AIRBench 2024 Safety Scenariossafety_scenarios#35 / 800.709Source ↗official
Contextual MoralChoicehuman_agreement#21 / 220.3Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#109 / 24817.19Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#158 / 24885.83Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#58 / 24889.16Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#118 / 24696.45Source ↗official
HELM Safetyanthropic_red_team#41 / 800.988Source ↗official
HELM Safetybbq#70 / 800.765Source ↗official
HELM Safetyharmbench#43 / 800.727Source ↗official
HELM Safetysimple_safety_tests#29 / 800.993Source ↗official
HELM Safetyxstest#43 / 800.956Source ↗official
JailBenchjailbreak_success_rate#2 / 1443.94Source ↗official
Large-scale Moral Machine experiment on LLMshuman_choice_distance#8 / 390.8324Source ↗official
Microsoft Phi Safety Panelsharmful_continuation#6 / 100.013Source ↗official
Microsoft Phi Safety Panelsharmful_summarization#1 / 100.082Source ↗official
Microsoft Phi Safety Panelsjailbreak#7 / 100.13Source ↗official
Microsoft Phi Safety Panelsthird_party_harm#7 / 100.373Source ↗official
MT-JailBench CrescendoXsafety_score#8 / 2128.93Source ↗official
MuPPET Contextual Privacymultiparty_contextual_privacy_score#4 / 741.71Source ↗official
OR-Benchover_refusal_rate#15 / 2569.4Source ↗official
OR-Benchtoxic_acceptance_rate#14 / 255Source ↗official
S-Evalbase_en_overall#8 / 2269.1Source ↗official
SORRY-Benchavg#19 / 510.22Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AIRBench 2024 Safety Scenariossafety_scenarios#46 / 800.709Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#90 / 24885.83Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#191 / 24889.16Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#129 / 24696.45Source ↗official
HELM Safetyanthropic_red_team#38 / 800.988Source ↗official
HELM Safetyharmbench#38 / 800.727Source ↗official
HELM Safetysimple_safety_tests#50 / 800.993Source ↗official
HELM Safetyxstest#43 / 800.956Source ↗official
JailBenchjailbreak_success_rate#13 / 1443.94Source ↗official
Microsoft Phi Safety Panelsharmful_continuation#4 / 100.013Source ↗official
Microsoft Phi Safety Panelsharmful_summarization#10 / 100.082Source ↗official
Microsoft Phi Safety Panelsjailbreak#4 / 100.13Source ↗official
Microsoft Phi Safety Panelsthird_party_harm#4 / 100.373Source ↗official
MT-JailBench CrescendoXsafety_score#14 / 2128.93Source ↗official
MuPPET Contextual Privacymultiparty_contextual_privacy_score#4 / 741.71Source ↗official
OR-Benchover_refusal_rate#15 / 2569.4Source ↗official
OR-Benchtoxic_acceptance_rate#12 / 255Source ↗official
S-Evalbase_en_overall#15 / 2269.1Source ↗official
SORRY-Benchavg#33 / 510.22Source ↗official
SpeechMap model completioncomplete_pct#157 / 18134.4Source ↗official