Model profile
Ling 2.6 Flash
InclusionAIdeveloper
#273 / 312overall rank
4eval lineages
Evidence summary
Ling 2.6 Flash has an estimated overall rank of #273; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #130–#306. Its behavior-only rank is #279; company governance moves the combined estimate to #273. Published evidence spans 4 evals and 5 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is SABER (scenario_c_safety_rate, #4 of 13); its weakest is AA-Omniscience (hallucination_rate, #325 of 330).
Compare this model
Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.
Official and reference links
- Artificial Analysis ↗ling-2-6-flash
- OpenRouter ↗inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash
- Official model page ↗Family-level model document · inclusion ai · first party
Published eval results
Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate | #325 / 330 | ↓0.9672 | Source ↗official | |
| SABERoverall_safety_rate | #7 / 13 | ↑24.63 | Source ↗official | |
| SABERscenario_a_safety_rate | #10 / 13 | ↑25.79 | Source ↗official | |
| SABERscenario_b_safety_rate | #8 / 13 | ↑30.66 | Source ↗official | |
| SABERscenario_c_safety_rate | #4 / 13 | ↑18.68 | Source ↗official | |
| SM-Benchadversarial | #54 / 79 | ↑79.51 | Source ↗official | |
| SM-Benchambiguous_interpretation | #68 / 79 | ↑73.21 | Source ↗official | |
| SM-Benchanti_hallucination | #61 / 79 | ↑85.86 | Source ↗official | |
| SM-Bencheq_boundaries | #60 / 79 | ↑56.46 | Source ↗official | |
| SM-Benchoverfit | #72 / 79 | ↑26.23 | Source ↗official | |
| TACbase_welfare_rate | #64 / 76 | ↑19.23 | Source ↗self run |