Model profile
Ling 2.6 1T
Evidence summary
Safety. Ling 2.6 1T does not meet the evidence gate for a Safety rank. Published Safety evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is AA-Omniscience (hallucination_rate, #324 of 361); its weakest is AA-Omniscience (hallucination_rate, #324 of 361).
Freedom. Ling 2.6 1T has an estimated Freedom rank of #486; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #305–#565. Published Freedom evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is SpeechMap model completion (complete_pct, #123 of 181); its weakest is SpeechMap model completion (complete_pct, #123 of 181).
Compare this model
Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.
Official and reference links
- Artificial Analysis ↗ling-2-6-1t
- OpenRouter ↗inclusionai/ling-2.6-1t
- Official model page ↗Family-level model document · inclusion ai · first party
- Release source ↗repository created at proxy
Safety evals
Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate | #324 / 361 | ↓0.9283 | Source ↗official |
Freedom evals
Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SpeechMap model completioncomplete_pct | #123 / 181 | ↑46.7 | Source ↗official |