← Models

Model profile

Ling 1T

InclusionAIdeveloper
2025-10-02release date
Not rankedSafety rank
#217 / 645Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. Ling 1T does not meet the evidence gate for a Safety rank. Published Safety evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is AA-Omniscience (hallucination_rate, #322 of 345); its weakest is AA-Omniscience (hallucination_rate, #322 of 345).

Freedom. Ling 1T has an estimated Freedom rank of #217; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #69–#510. Published Freedom evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingness (willingness_direct_score, #4 of 156); its weakest is UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingness (willingness_adherence_score, #79 of 156).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#322 / 3450.9473Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingnesswillingness_adherence_score#79 / 1561.5Source ↗official
UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingnesswillingness_direct_score#4 / 1566Source ↗official

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

UGI Political Values

DimensionValueDistribution
Political Lean-20.3
Government44.6
Diplomacy65.6
Economy44.9
Society58.2