← Models

Model profile

LFM2 700M

Liquid AIdeveloper
2025-07-10release date
Not rankedSafety rank
#188 / 663Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. LFM2 700M does not meet the evidence gate for a Safety rank. Published Safety evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 3 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (bias_attack_non_success_rate, #69 of 272); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #205 of 272).

Freedom. LFM2 700M has an estimated Freedom rank of #188; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #68–#473. Published Freedom evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #66 of 272); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (toxicity_attack_non_success_rate, #128 of 270).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#69 / 272↑26.36Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#205 / 272↑79Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#186 / 272↑55.56Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#143 / 270↑96.21Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#66 / 272↓79Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#82 / 272↓55.56Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#128 / 270↓96.21Source ↗official