← Models

Model profile

LFM2 350M

Liquid AIdeveloper
2025-07-10release date
Not rankedSafety rank
#90 / 645Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. LFM2 350M does not meet the evidence gate for a Safety rank. Published Safety evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 3 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (bias_attack_non_success_rate, #91 of 248); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #229 of 248).

Freedom. LFM2 350M has an estimated Freedom rank of #90; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #39–#443. Published Freedom evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #20 of 248); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (toxicity_attack_non_success_rate, #144 of 246).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#91 / 24819.38Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#229 / 24869.67Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#202 / 24843.89Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#102 / 24697.12Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#20 / 24869.67Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#44 / 24843.89Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#144 / 24697.12Source ↗official