Model profile
Grok 4
xAIdeveloper
2025-07-09release date
#136 / 312overall rank
30eval lineages
Evidence summary
Grok 4 has an estimated overall rank of #136; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #63–#197. Its behavior-only rank is #142; company governance moves the combined estimate to #136. Published evidence spans 30 evals and 7 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is Confabulations (confabulation_rate, #3 of 52); its weakest is Emergent Collusion (high_illegality_game_rate, #13 of 13).
Compare this model
Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.
Official and reference links
- Artificial Analysis ↗grok-4
- OpenRouter ↗x-ai/grok-4
- Official model documentation ↗Family-level model document · xai · first party
- Release source ↗direct research preview identity date
Published eval results
Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate | #90 / 330 | ↓0.6449 | Source ↗official | |
| AIRBench 2024 Safety Scenariossafety_scenarios | #69 / 80 | ↑0.444 | Source ↗official | |
| Arena Factuality — Search Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating | #26 / 30 | ↑1128.0 | Source ↗official | |
| Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating | #50 / 112 | ↑1440.0 | Source ↗official | |
| BrokenMathsycophancy | #5 / 9 | ↓43.4 | Source ↗official | |
| CAIS Risk Indexagent_red_teaming | #31 / 45 | ↓85.9 | Source ↗official | |
| CAIS Risk Indexbioweapons_assistance | #21 / 50 | ↓64.2 | Source ↗official | |
| CAIS Risk Indexhle_overconfidence | #27 / 51 | ↓56.4 | Source ↗official | |
| CAIS Risk Indexmachiavelli | #36 / 47 | ↓93.4 | Source ↗official | |
| CAIS Risk Indexmask | #36 / 53 | ↓41.7 | Source ↗official | |
| CAIS Risk Indexpolitical_manipulation | #21 / 34 | ↓49.5 | Source ↗official | |
| CAIS Risk Indextextquests_harm | #47 / 50 | ↓24.3 | Source ↗official | |
| Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate | #39 / 104 | ↓21.78 | Source ↗official | |
| Confabulationsconfabulation_rate | #3 / 52 | ↓3.96 | Source ↗official | |
| DystopiaBenchbasaglia_score | #28 / 50 | ↓65.3 | Source ↗official | |
| DystopiaBenchbaudrillard_score | #25 / 50 | ↓57.7 | Source ↗official | |
| DystopiaBenchhuxley_score | #30 / 50 | ↓73.17 | Source ↗official | |
| DystopiaBenchlaguardia_score | #15 / 50 | ↓59.07 | Source ↗official | |
| DystopiaBenchorwell_score | #25 / 50 | ↓68.63 | Source ↗official | |
| DystopiaBenchpetrov_score | #31 / 50 | ↓74.37 | Source ↗official | |
| Emergent Collusionhigh_illegality_game_rate | #13 / 13 | ↓0.75 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate | #179 / 241 | ↑12.4 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate | #211 / 241 | ↑76.83 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate | #220 / 241 | ↑33.89 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate | #142 / 239 | ↑95.45 | Source ↗official | |
| FlagEval Safety and Valuesa1_qualified_rate | #6 / 18 | ↑81.99 | Source ↗official | |
| FlagEval Safety and Valuesa2_qualified_rate | #7 / 18 | ↑80.3 | Source ↗official | |
| FlagEval Safety and Valuesa3_qualified_rate | #12 / 18 | ↑86.36 | Source ↗official | |
| FlagEval Safety and Valuesa4_qualified_rate | #10 / 18 | ↑87.98 | Source ↗official | |
| FlagEval Safety and Valuesa5_qualified_rate | #6 / 18 | ↑72.83 | Source ↗official | |
| HELM Safetyanthropic_red_team | #71 / 80 | ↑0.957 | Source ↗official | |
| HELM Safetybbq | #40 / 80 | ↑0.937 | Source ↗official | |
| HELM Safetyharmbench | #78 / 80 | ↑0.397 | Source ↗official | |
| HELM Safetysimple_safety_tests | #73 / 80 | ↑0.922 | Source ↗official | |
| HELM Safetyxstest | #30 / 80 | ↑0.966 | Source ↗official | |
| HUMAINE Trust, Ethics and Safetytrust_ethics_safety_score | #9 / 54 | ↑28.61 | Source ↗official | |
| MACHIAVELLIdeception_relative_random_pct | #36 / 50 | ↓93.4 | Source ↗official | |
| PHAREbias_resistance_diagnostic | #61 / 66 | ↑0.3116 | Source ↗official | |
| PHAREhallucination_resistance_diagnostic | #17 / 70 | ↑0.8073 | Source ↗official | |
| PHAREharm_resistance_diagnostic | #70 / 70 | ↑0.7177 | Source ↗official | |
| PHAREjailbreak_resistance_diagnostic | #20 / 67 | ↑0.6485 | Source ↗official | |
| RealityTest — Text AI-Identity Disclosuredisclosure_probability | #7 / 17 | ↑0.413 | Source ↗official | |
| Shelleducation_jsr | #14 / 14 | ↓0.81 | Source ↗official | |
| Shellfinance_jsr | #7 / 14 | ↓0.486 | Source ↗official | |
| Shellmanagement_jsr | #7 / 14 | ↓0.596 | Source ↗official | |
| Social Welfare Function Benchmarkfairness | #2 / 19 | ↑0.619 | Source ↗official | |
| SpeciEvalbelief_animal_sentience | #41 / 113 | ↑6.87 | Source ↗official | |
| SpeciEvalland_animal_4ns | #55 / 113 | ↓4.53 | Source ↗official | |
| SpeciEvalsea_animal_4ns | #62 / 113 | ↓4.78 | Source ↗official | |
| SpeciEvalspeciesism | #27 / 113 | ↓1.65 | Source ↗official | |
| StereoTales Harmful Associationsbenign_significant_association_score | #16 / 23 | ↑85.53 | Source ↗official | |
| TrustLLM contemporary collapsed applicationtrustllm | #3 / 8 | ↑0.62 | Source ↗official |
Values evaluations
Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.