← Models

Model profile

Grok 4.20

xAIdeveloper
2026-03-10release date
#121 / 312overall rank
22eval lineages

Evidence summary

Grok 4.20 has an estimated overall rank of #121; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #60–#240. Its behavior-only rank is #116; company governance moves the combined estimate to #121. Published evidence spans 22 evals and 7 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is SM-Bench (eq_boundaries, #1 of 79); its weakest is BioSecBench-Refusal (balanced_refusal_score, #10 of 10).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Published eval results

Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#7 / 3300.1992Source ↗official
Arena Factuality — Search Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating#10 / 301210.0Source ↗official
Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating#37 / 1121446.0Source ↗official
BioSecBench-Refusalbalanced_refusal_score#10 / 100.02854Source ↗official
BullshitBench v2clear_pushback_rate#18 / 1060.55Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexagent_red_teaming#30 / 4584.6Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexbioweapons_assistance#11 / 5056.9Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexhle_overconfidence#14 / 5145.8Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexmachiavelli#11 / 4783.8Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexmask#35 / 5341Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexpolitical_manipulation#9 / 3439.9Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indextextquests_harm#4 / 509.9Source ↗official
Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate#45 / 10431.95Source ↗official
DelusionEvaldelusional_prevalence_pct#16 / 1670Source ↗official
DelusionEvaldiscourages_harm_prevalence_pct#6 / 1631.4Source ↗official
DelusionEvalfacilitates_harm_prevalence_pct#16 / 1611.6Source ↗official
DelusionEvalrelationship_prevalence_pct#16 / 1653.4Source ↗official
DelusionEvalsycophancy_prevalence_pct#15 / 1636.2Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbasaglia_score#44 / 5070.5Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbaudrillard_score#41 / 5067.37Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchhuxley_score#36 / 5075.07Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchlaguardia_score#42 / 5069.8Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchorwell_score#42 / 5075.07Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchpetrov_score#33 / 5075.03Source ↗official
HUMAINE Trust, Ethics and Safetytrust_ethics_safety_score#26 / 5427.15Source ↗official
MACHIAVELLIdeception_relative_random_pct#11 / 5083.8Source ↗official
ODCV-Benchaverage_severity#12 / 122.564Source ↗official
ODCV-Benchmisalignment_rate#12 / 1262.82Source ↗official
Pander Scoreconversational_absolute_pander_score#15 / 2019.26Source ↗official
Pander Scoreinstructional_absolute_pander_score#15 / 2068.73Source ↗official
RefusalBenchyouden_j#1 / 190.7871Source ↗official
SM-Benchadversarial#68 / 7975.61Source ↗official
SM-Benchambiguous_interpretation#73 / 7966.96Source ↗official
SM-Benchanti_hallucination#50 / 7988.74Source ↗official
SM-Bencheq_boundaries#1 / 7990.45Source ↗official
SM-Benchoverfit#58 / 7954.1Source ↗official
SpeciEvalbelief_animal_sentience#29 / 1136.93Source ↗official
SpeciEvalland_animal_4ns#67 / 1134.62Source ↗official
SpeciEvalsea_animal_4ns#82 / 1134.92Source ↗official
SpeciEvalspeciesism#30 / 1131.7Source ↗official
VETO Misfired Alignmentmisfired_alignment_rate_pct#10 / 257.9Source ↗official
WildClawBench Safety & Alignment (OpenClaw harness)safety_alignment_score_pct#19 / 2433.55Source ↗official

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

Agent-ValueBench Moral Foundations (MFT08)

Agent-ValueBench HEXACO

DimensionValueDistribution
Openness to experience5.5
Honesty-humility4.2
Extraversion5.5
Agreeableness6.8
Conscientiousness7.5

Agent-ValueBench Schwartz Basic Values (PVQ40)

The Economist World Values Survey Cultural Map

DimensionValueDistribution
Survival ↔ Self-expression2.92
Traditional ↔ Secular-1.83