← Models

Model profile

Grok 4 Fast

xAIdeveloper
2025-09-19release date
#134 / 333Safety rank
#376 / 645Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. Grok 4 Fast has an estimated Safety rank of #134; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #64–#239. Its behavior-only rank is #130; company governance moves the combined estimate to #134. Published Safety evidence spans 18 eval lineages and 6 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is PHARE (bias_resistance_diagnostic, #2 of 66); its weakest is CAIS Risk Index (mask, #55 of 57).

Freedom. Grok 4 Fast has an estimated Freedom rank of #376; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #164–#533. Published Freedom evidence spans 6 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is PHARE (harm_resistance_diagnostic, #7 of 70); its weakest is Human Pathogen Capabilities Test (HPCT) — overall refusal (refusal_rate_pct, #53 of 69).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#121 / 3450.6827Source ↗official
Adversarial Poetry — AILuminate Baseline and Poetry ASRbaseline_asr#14 / 247.84Source ↗official
Adversarial Poetry — AILuminate Baseline and Poetry ASRpoetry_asr#10 / 2435.58Source ↗official
AgentDrive Safety Compliancescr#20 / 4888.75Source ↗official
ANIMAscore#16 / 220.6164Source ↗official
Arena Factuality — Search Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating#28 / 301112.0Source ↗official
Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating#67 / 1111430.0Source ↗official
BrokenMathsycophancy#4 / 940Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexbioweapons_assistance#22 / 5464.1Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexhle_overconfidence#41 / 5568.7Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexmachiavelli#46 / 5196.2Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexmask#55 / 5770Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexpolitical_manipulation#2 / 4830.8Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indextextquests_harm#30 / 5419.8Source ↗official
Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate#43 / 10430.03Source ↗official
Human Pathogen Capabilities Test (HPCT) — overall refusalrefusal_rate_pct#17 / 6919.5Source ↗official
MACHIAVELLIdeception_relative_random_pct#43 / 5096.2Source ↗official
NESSiE Necessary Safety Benchmarksh_score#5 / 1692.02Source ↗official
PHAREbias_resistance_diagnostic#2 / 660.8026Source ↗official
PHAREhallucination_resistance_diagnostic#62 / 700.634Source ↗official
PHAREharm_resistance_diagnostic#64 / 700.8134Source ↗official
PHAREjailbreak_resistance_diagnostic#49 / 670.412Source ↗official
UAVBench safety-critical decision recognitionethical_safety_critical_accuracy#14 / 270.695Source ↗official
Vectara HHEM Factual Consistencyfactual_consistency_rate#90 / 9480.05Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Adversarial Poetry — AILuminate Baseline and Poetry ASRbaseline_asr#11 / 247.84Source ↗official
Adversarial Poetry — AILuminate Baseline and Poetry ASRpoetry_asr#15 / 2435.58Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexbioweapons_assistance#33 / 5464.1Source ↗official
Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate#62 / 10430.03Source ↗official
Human Pathogen Capabilities Test (HPCT) — overall refusalrefusal_rate_pct#53 / 6919.5Source ↗official
PHAREharm_resistance_diagnostic#7 / 700.8134Source ↗official
PHAREjailbreak_resistance_diagnostic#19 / 670.412Source ↗official
UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingnesswillingness_adherence_score#35 / 1565.25Source ↗official
UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingnesswillingness_direct_score#66 / 1563.5Source ↗official

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

UGI Political Values

DimensionValueDistribution
Political Lean-11.2
Government46
Diplomacy62.5
Economy40
Society63.8