← Models

Model profile

GPT 5.4 Mini

OpenAIdeveloper
2026-03-17release date
#69 / 333Safety rank
#631 / 645Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. GPT 5.4 Mini has an estimated Safety rank of #69; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #22–#213. Its behavior-only rank is #78; company governance moves the combined estimate to #69. Published Safety evidence spans 23 eval lineages and 6 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting) (factuality_bt_rating, #1 of 111); its weakest is SM-Bench (overfit, #82 of 84).

Freedom. GPT 5.4 Mini has an estimated Freedom rank of #631; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #465–#637. Published Freedom evidence spans 7 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is SM-Bench (adversarial, #14 of 84); its weakest is Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5 (intellectual_property, #31 of 31).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#269 / 3450.8985Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5child_sexual_exploitation#7 / 3119.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5defamation#3 / 3126.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5hate#4 / 3128.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5indiscriminate_weapons_cbrne#10 / 3133.3Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5intellectual_property#1 / 3114.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5non_violent_crimes#3 / 3123.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5privacy#2 / 3123.4Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sex_related_crimes#4 / 3119.6Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sexual_content#6 / 3127.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5specialized_advice#3 / 3122.48Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5suicide_self_harm#3 / 318.5Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5violent_crimes#3 / 3123.9Source ↗official
Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating#1 / 1111497.0Source ↗official
BullshitBench v2clear_pushback_rate#60 / 1170.3167Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexagent_red_teaming#27 / 4974.3Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexbioweapons_assistance#15 / 5460Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexhle_overconfidence#29 / 5555.2Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexmachiavelli#44 / 5195.6Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexmask#25 / 5715.9Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexpolitical_manipulation#44 / 4861.1Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indextextquests_harm#13 / 5415.4Source ↗official
Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate#26 / 1049.571Source ↗official
DelusionEvaldelusional_prevalence_pct#1 / 1611.2Source ↗official
DelusionEvaldiscourages_harm_prevalence_pct#2 / 1661.3Source ↗official
DelusionEvalfacilitates_harm_prevalence_pct#1 / 160Source ↗official
DelusionEvalrelationship_prevalence_pct#1 / 167.1Source ↗official
DelusionEvalsycophancy_prevalence_pct#2 / 1615.2Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbasaglia_score#14 / 5049.13Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbaudrillard_score#12 / 5038.87Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchhuxley_score#11 / 5045.1Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchlaguardia_score#11 / 5052.8Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchorwell_score#12 / 5041.8Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchpetrov_score#9 / 5039.6Source ↗official
Every Model Cheats — Cybench Cheat Propensitybaseline_cheat_propensity_pct#5 / 2221.7Source ↗official
Every Model Cheats — Cybench Cheat Propensitysevere_anti_cheat_cheat_propensity_pct#17 / 2213Source ↗official
Every Model Cheats — Cybench Cheat Propensitystandard_anti_cheat_cheat_propensity_pct#10 / 2213Source ↗official
Governance Decay under Passive Context Compactiongovernance_retention_score#5 / 759Source ↗official
JuICE Cultural-Error Span Detectionf1#9 / 100.3079Source ↗official
MACHIAVELLIdeception_relative_random_pct#41 / 5095.6Source ↗official
Pander Scoreconversational_absolute_pander_score#18 / 2616.43Source ↗official
Pander Scoreinstructional_absolute_pander_score#15 / 2638.82Source ↗official
RefusalBenchyouden_j#5 / 190.3787Source ↗official
SM-Benchadversarial#71 / 8476.83Source ↗official
SM-Benchambiguous_interpretation#48 / 8484.08Source ↗official
SM-Benchanti_hallucination#73 / 8480.23Source ↗official
SM-Bencheq_boundaries#35 / 8467.28Source ↗official
SM-Benchoverfit#82 / 8415.3Source ↗official
Vals AI Cheating Auditterminal_bench_cheating_shortcut_evidence_rate_pct#2 / 140.3745Source ↗official
Vectara HHEM Factual Consistencyfactual_consistency_rate#16 / 9494.5Source ↗official
VETO Misfired Alignmentmisfired_alignment_rate_pct#17 / 259.9Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5child_sexual_exploitation#25 / 3119.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5defamation#29 / 3126.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5hate#28 / 3128.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5indiscriminate_weapons_cbrne#21 / 3133.3Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5intellectual_property#31 / 3114.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5non_violent_crimes#29 / 3123.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5privacy#29 / 3123.4Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sex_related_crimes#28 / 3119.6Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sexual_content#26 / 3127.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5specialized_advice#29 / 3122.48Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5suicide_self_harm#29 / 318.5Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5violent_crimes#28 / 3123.9Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexbioweapons_assistance#40 / 5460Source ↗official
Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate#79 / 1049.571Source ↗official
DelusionEvaldiscourages_harm_prevalence_pct#15 / 1661.3Source ↗official
DelusionEvalfacilitates_harm_prevalence_pct#15 / 160Source ↗official
SM-Benchadversarial#14 / 8476.83Source ↗official
SM-Bencheq_boundaries#35 / 8467.28Source ↗official
SM-Benchoverfit#82 / 8415.3Source ↗official
SpeechMap model completioncomplete_pct#170 / 18129.4Source ↗official
VETO Misfired Alignmentmisfired_alignment_rate_pct#17 / 259.9Source ↗official

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

Agent-ValueBench Moral Foundations (MFT08)

Agent-ValueBench HEXACO

DimensionValueDistribution
Openness to experience5.5
Honesty-humility5.3
Extraversion6.1
Agreeableness6.5
Conscientiousness7.3

Agent-ValueBench Schwartz Basic Values (PVQ40)