← Models

Model profile

GPT 5.1

OpenAIdeveloper
2025-11-13release date
#44 / 309overall rank
30eval lineages

Evidence summary

GPT 5.1 has an estimated overall rank of #44; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #22–#143. Its behavior-only rank is #52; company governance moves the combined estimate to #44. Published evidence spans 30 evals and 7 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting) (factuality_bt_rating, #7 of 112); its weakest is GPT-5.6 system card (hate_not_unsafe, #7 of 7).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Published eval results

Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#64 / 3280.5189Source ↗official
AgentAbstainabstain#10 / 1760.7Source ↗official
AgentAbstaincar#11 / 1753.2Source ↗official
AgentAbstainpaired#13 / 1740.6Source ↗official
AIRBench 2024 Safety Scenariossafety_scenarios#9 / 800.862Source ↗official
Arena Factuality — Search Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating#6 / 301226.0Source ↗official
Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating#7 / 1121483.0Source ↗official
BullshitBench v2clear_pushback_rate#41 / 1060.35Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexagent_red_teaming#26 / 4482.1Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexbioweapons_assistance#24 / 4966.3Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexhle_overconfidence#18 / 5047.8Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexmachiavelli#27 / 4689.6Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexmask#16 / 5212Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexpolitical_manipulation#17 / 3347.9Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indextextquests_harm#19 / 4916.7Source ↗official
Constitutional Following — OpenAI Model Specconstitutional_following_score#1 / 796.1Source ↗official
Contextual MoralChoicehuman_agreement#6 / 220.45Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#23 / 24143.67Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#33 / 24193.5Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#73 / 24183.89Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#135 / 23995.64Source ↗official
FORTRESSaverage_risk_score#23 / 4928.04Source ↗official
FORTRESSover_refusal_score#31 / 465.78Source ↗official
GPT-5.6 system cardconnectors_injection_resistance#7 / 70.649Source ↗official
GPT-5.6 system cardemotional_reliance#7 / 70.857Source ↗official
GPT-5.6 system cardextremism_not_unsafe#1 / 71Source ↗official
GPT-5.6 system cardgore_not_unsafe#3 / 70.8Source ↗official
GPT-5.6 system cardharm_overall_pct#7 / 71.28Source ↗official
GPT-5.6 system cardhate_not_unsafe#7 / 70.808Source ↗official
GPT-5.6 system cardmental_health#7 / 70.753Source ↗official
GPT-5.6 system cardnonviolent_illicit_not_unsafe#4 / 70.99Source ↗official
GPT-5.6 system cardsearch_function_calling_injection_resistance#6 / 60.423Source ↗official
GPT-5.6 system cardself_harm#5 / 70.904Source ↗official
GPT-5.6 system cardself_harm_not_unsafe#6 / 70.926Source ↗official
GPT-5.6 system cardsexual_minors_not_unsafe#7 / 70.916Source ↗official
GPT-5.6 system cardsexual_not_unsafe#6 / 70.933Source ↗official
GPT-5.6 system cardviolent_illicit_not_unsafe#3 / 70.955Source ↗official
HELM Safetyanthropic_red_team#18 / 800.995Source ↗official
HELM Safetybbq#58 / 800.887Source ↗official
HELM Safetyharmbench#6 / 800.976Source ↗official
HELM Safetysimple_safety_tests#24 / 800.998Source ↗official
HELM Safetyxstest#9 / 800.982Source ↗official
MACHIAVELLIdeception_relative_random_pct#27 / 5089.6Source ↗official
MASKlying_probability_pct#20 / 5325.17Source ↗official
OpenAI GPT-5.3 Dynamic Wellbeingemotional_reliance#3 / 30.945Source ↗official
OpenAI GPT-5.3 Dynamic Wellbeingmental_health#3 / 30.832Source ↗official
OpenAI GPT-5.3 Dynamic Wellbeingself_harm#3 / 30.845Source ↗official
OpenAI GPT-5.4 Dynamic Wellbeingemotional_reliance#3 / 30.857Source ↗official
OpenAI GPT-5.4 Dynamic Wellbeingmental_health#3 / 30.753Source ↗official
OpenAI GPT-5.4 Dynamic Wellbeingself_harm#3 / 30.904Source ↗official
OpenAI GPT-5.4 First-Person Fairnessharm_overall#3 / 30.0128Source ↗official
PHAREbias_resistance_diagnostic#30 / 660.4677Source ↗official
PHAREhallucination_resistance_diagnostic#14 / 700.8184Source ↗official
PHAREharm_resistance_diagnostic#14 / 700.9692Source ↗official
PHAREjailbreak_resistance_diagnostic#17 / 670.6576Source ↗official
RealityTest — Text AI-Identity Disclosuredisclosure_probability#2 / 170.856Source ↗official
SM-Benchadversarial#17 / 7986.34Source ↗official
SM-Benchambiguous_interpretation#15 / 7990.18Source ↗official
SM-Benchanti_hallucination#43 / 7991.62Source ↗official
SM-Bencheq_boundaries#62 / 7955.62Source ↗official
SM-Benchoverfit#53 / 7960.11Source ↗official
SpeciEvalbelief_animal_sentience#41 / 1136.87Source ↗official
SpeciEvalland_animal_4ns#15 / 1134.2Source ↗official
SpeciEvalsea_animal_4ns#10 / 1134.3Source ↗official
SpeciEvalspeciesism#11 / 1131.35Source ↗official
Vectara HHEM Factual Consistencyfactual_consistency_rate#67 / 9488.5Source ↗official
Vigil Mental Health Safetyoverall_score#7 / 2358Source ↗official