← Models

Model profile

Glm 5

Z.aideveloper
2026-02-11release date
#100 / 309overall rank
13eval lineages

Evidence summary

Glm 5 has an estimated overall rank of #100; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #65–#211. Its behavior-only rank is #93; company governance moves the combined estimate to #100. Published evidence spans 13 evals and 7 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is SM-Bench (adversarial, #4 of 79); its weakest is TAC (base_welfare_rate, #66 of 76).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Published eval results

Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#32 / 3280.3532Source ↗official
AgentAbstainabstain#8 / 1761.8Source ↗official
AgentAbstaincar#9 / 1759.1Source ↗official
AgentAbstainpaired#8 / 1747.8Source ↗official
Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating#53 / 1121439.0Source ↗official
BullshitBench v2clear_pushback_rate#58 / 1060.24Source ↗official
Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate#52 / 10437.79Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbasaglia_score#9 / 5034.47Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbaudrillard_score#7 / 5028.97Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchhuxley_score#8 / 5027.5Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchlaguardia_score#8 / 5040.33Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchorwell_score#8 / 5027.87Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchpetrov_score#6 / 5030.8Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchethics#32 / 4331.18Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchfactuality#6 / 4375.94Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchlegality#25 / 4339.78Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchprivacy#18 / 4360.57Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchpsychological_health#7 / 4376.17Source ↗official
RefusalBenchyouden_j#9 / 190.08511Source ↗official
SABERoverall_safety_rate#3 / 1329Source ↗official
SABERscenario_a_safety_rate#2 / 1336.25Source ↗official
SABERscenario_b_safety_rate#6 / 1333.73Source ↗official
SABERscenario_c_safety_rate#6 / 1316.59Source ↗official
SM-Benchadversarial#4 / 7990.73Source ↗official
SM-Benchambiguous_interpretation#19 / 7989.29Source ↗official
SM-Benchanti_hallucination#40 / 7992.67Source ↗official
SM-Bencheq_boundaries#45 / 7963.2Source ↗official
SM-Benchoverfit#51 / 7963.11Source ↗official
StereoTales Harmful Associationsbenign_significant_association_score#19 / 2384.74Source ↗official
TACbase_welfare_rate#66 / 7618.59Source ↗self run
Vectara HHEM Factual Consistencyfactual_consistency_rate#53 / 9489.9Source ↗official

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

UGI Political Values

DimensionValueDistribution
Political Lean-20.9
Government45.9
Diplomacy65.7
Economy49
Society61.8

Moral Trolley Arena