← Models

Model profile

Glm 5 Turbo

Z.aideveloper
2026-03-15release date
#227 / 312overall rank
5eval lineages

Evidence summary

Glm 5 Turbo has an estimated overall rank of #227; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #110–#287. Its behavior-only rank is #222; company governance moves the combined estimate to #227. Published evidence spans 5 evals and 5 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (harmful_attack_non_success_rate, #51 of 241); its weakest is SM-Bench (ambiguous_interpretation, #79 of 79).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Published eval results

Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#84 / 3300.6264Source ↗official
BullshitBench v2clear_pushback_rate#55 / 1060.27Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#187 / 24111.89Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#213 / 24176Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#51 / 24188.89Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#142 / 23995.45Source ↗official
SM-Benchadversarial#63 / 7977.56Source ↗official
SM-Benchambiguous_interpretation#79 / 7913.69Source ↗official
SM-Benchanti_hallucination#79 / 7918.85Source ↗official
SM-Bencheq_boundaries#20 / 7969.1Source ↗official
SM-Benchoverfit#42 / 7970.49Source ↗official
WildClawBench Safety & Alignment (OpenClaw harness)safety_alignment_score_pct#21 / 2432.19Source ↗official