← Models

Model profile

Glm 5 Turbo

Z.aideveloper
2026-03-15release date
#181 / 267overall rank
4eval lineages

Evidence summary

Glm 5 Turbo has an estimated overall rank of #181; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #72–#247. Its behavior-only rank is #176; company governance moves the combined estimate to #181. Published evidence spans 4 evals and 5 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (harmful_attack_non_success_rate, #59 of 260); its weakest is SM-Bench (ambiguous_interpretation, #73 of 73).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Published eval results

Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionBetterSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#75 / 3110.6217↓ lowerSource ↗official
BullshitBench v2clear_pushback_rate#54 / 1050.27↑ higherSource ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#203 / 26011.89↑ higherSource ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#232 / 26076↑ higherSource ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#59 / 26088.89↑ higherSource ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#155 / 25895.45↑ higherSource ↗official
SM-Benchadversarial#57 / 7377.56↑ higherSource ↗official
SM-Benchambiguous_interpretation#73 / 7313.69↑ higherSource ↗official
SM-Benchanti_hallucination#73 / 7318.85↑ higherSource ↗official
SM-Bencheq_boundaries#18 / 7369.1↑ higherSource ↗official
SM-Benchoverfit#38 / 7370.49↑ higherSource ↗official