Model profile
Glm 4.7 Flash
Evidence summary
Glm 4.7 Flash has an estimated overall rank of #132; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #26–#249. Its behavior-only rank is #130; company governance moves the combined estimate to #132. Published evidence spans 4 evals and 3 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is TAC (base_welfare_rate, #20 of 68); its weakest is SpeciEval (speciesism, #92 of 102).
Compare this model
Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.
Official and reference links
- Artificial Analysis ↗glm-4-7-flash
- Hugging Face ↗zai-org/GLM-4.7-Flash
- OpenRouter ↗z-ai/glm-4.7-flash
- Official model page ↗Exact model document · Reviewed official Hugging Face owner · official repository
- Release source ↗repository created at proxy
Published eval results
Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Better | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate | #189 / 311 | 0.8432 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate | #92 / 105 | 72.03 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| SpeciEvalbelief_animal_sentience | #41 / 102 | 6.85 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| SpeciEvalland_animal_4ns | #76 / 102 | 4.78 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| SpeciEvalsea_animal_4ns | #49 / 102 | 4.75 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| SpeciEvalspeciesism | #92 / 102 | 2.85 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| TACbase_welfare_rate | #20 / 68 | 33.33 | ↑ higher | Source ↗self run |
Values evaluations
Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.