Model profile
Glm 4 9B Chat
Z.aideveloper
2024-06-05release date
#190 / 312overall rank
8eval lineages
Evidence summary
Glm 4 9B Chat has an estimated overall rank of #190; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #72–#255. Its behavior-only rank is #193; company governance moves the combined estimate to #190. Published evidence spans 8 evals and 4 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is SafeDialBench (ethics, #1 of 18); its weakest is Agent-SafetyBench (spread_unsafe_information, #16 of 16).
Compare this model
Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.
Official and reference links
- Hugging Face ↗zai-org/glm-4-9b-chat
- Official model page ↗Exact model document · Reviewed official Hugging Face owner · official repository
- Release source ↗direct research preview identity date
Published eval results
Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agent-SafetyBenchcompromise_availability | #1 / 16 | ↑50.8 | Source ↗official | |
| Agent-SafetyBenchharmful_vulnerable_code | #15 / 16 | ↑23.2 | Source ↗official | |
| Agent-SafetyBenchleak_sensitive_information | #6 / 16 | ↑38.4 | Source ↗official | |
| Agent-SafetyBenchphysical_harm | #5 / 16 | ↑41.6 | Source ↗official | |
| Agent-SafetyBenchproduce_unsafe_information | #16 / 16 | ↑57.2 | Source ↗official | |
| Agent-SafetyBenchproperty_loss | #4 / 16 | ↑48 | Source ↗official | |
| Agent-SafetyBenchspread_unsafe_information | #16 / 16 | ↑6 | Source ↗official | |
| Agent-SafetyBenchviolate_law_ethics | #8 / 16 | ↑27.2 | Source ↗official | |
| ChineseSafescore | #16 / 22 | ↑50.03 | Source ↗official | |
| DSPSafeBenchscore | #7 / 12 | ↑72.43 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate | #96 / 241 | ↑18.35 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate | #185 / 241 | ↑82.33 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate | #181 / 241 | ↑48.33 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate | #227 / 239 | ↑75.41 | Source ↗official | |
| FinEval Financial Security Knowledgefinancial_security_accuracy_pct | #10 / 19 | ↑73.1 | Source ↗official | |
| JailBenchjailbreak_success_rate | #13 / 14 | ↓74.95 | Source ↗official | |
| M3-SafetyBenchoverall_score | #15 / 19 | ↑84.2 | Source ↗official | |
| SafeDialBenchaggression | #6 / 18 | ↑7.17 | Source ↗official | |
| SafeDialBenchethics | #1 / 18 | ↑7.753 | Source ↗official | |
| SafeDialBenchfairness | #8 / 18 | ↑7.4 | Source ↗official | |
| SafeDialBenchlegality | #2 / 18 | ↑8.103 | Source ↗official | |
| SafeDialBenchmorality | #3 / 18 | ↑7.427 | Source ↗official | |
| SafeDialBenchprivacy | #2 / 18 | ↑7.853 | Source ↗official |