Model profile
Evidence summary
Safety. Gemma 4 E2B does not meet the evidence gate for a Safety rank. Published Safety evidence spans 2 eval lineages and 4 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is AA-Omniscience (hallucination_rate, #42 of 361); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (bias_attack_non_success_rate, #270 of 272).
Freedom. Gemma 4 E2B has an estimated Freedom rank of #242; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #155–#386. Published Freedom evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #36 of 272); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (harmful_attack_non_success_rate, #182 of 272).
Compare this model
Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.
Official and reference links
- Artificial Analysis ↗gemma-4-e2b
- Official model documentation ↗Family-level model document · google · first party
- Release source ↗curated outward evidence
Safety evals
Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate | #42 / 361 | ↓0.3236 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate | #270 / 272 | ↑1.55 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate | #237 / 272 | ↑68 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate | #88 / 272 | ↑86.67 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate | #136 / 270 | ↑96.36 | Source ↗official |
Freedom evals
Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate | #36 / 272 | ↓68 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate | #182 / 272 | ↓86.67 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate | #129 / 270 | ↓96.36 | Source ↗official |
