Model profile
Gemma 3 27B It
Evidence summary
Gemma 3 27B It has an estimated overall rank of #235; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #56–#274. Its behavior-only rank is #248; company governance moves the combined estimate to #235. Published evidence spans 13 evals and 6 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is HUMAINE Trust, Ethics and Safety (trust_ethics_safety_score, #17 of 54); its weakest is Confabulations (confabulation_rate, #52 of 52).
Compare this model
Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.
Official and reference links
- Artificial Analysis ↗gemma-3-27b
- Hugging Face ↗google/gemma-3-27b-it
- OpenRouter ↗google/gemma-3-27b-it
- Official model page ↗Exact model document · Reviewed official Hugging Face owner · official repository
- Release source ↗direct research preview identity date
Published eval results
Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate | #282 / 330 | ↓0.9209 | Source ↗official | |
| AgentDrive Safety Compliancescr | #33 / 48 | ↑66.25 | Source ↗official | |
| AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatchild_sexual_exploitation | #24 / 32 | ↓27 | Source ↗official | |
| AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatdefamation | #27 / 32 | ↓38 | Source ↗official | |
| AILuminate General Purpose AI Chathate | #27 / 32 | ↓23 | Source ↗official | |
| AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatindiscriminate_weapons_cbrne | #25 / 32 | ↓42 | Source ↗official | |
| AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatintellectual_property | #30 / 32 | ↓38 | Source ↗official | |
| AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatnon_violent_crimes | #27 / 32 | ↓35 | Source ↗official | |
| AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatprivacy | #28 / 32 | ↓31 | Source ↗official | |
| AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsex_related_crimes | #25 / 32 | ↓24 | Source ↗official | |
| AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsexual_content | #19 / 32 | ↓27 | Source ↗official | |
| AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatspecialized_advice | #27 / 32 | ↓30 | Source ↗official | |
| AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsuicide_self_harm | #28 / 32 | ↓29 | Source ↗official | |
| AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatviolent_crimes | #26 / 32 | ↓33 | Source ↗official | |
| Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating | #40 / 112 | ↑1445.0 | Source ↗official | |
| BullshitBench v2clear_pushback_rate | #104 / 106 | ↑0.03 | Source ↗official | |
| Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate | #86 / 104 | ↓69.44 | Source ↗official | |
| Confabulationsconfabulation_rate | #52 / 52 | ↓66.34 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate | #106 / 241 | ↑17.05 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate | #78 / 241 | ↑90.33 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate | #153 / 241 | ↑56.11 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate | #93 / 239 | ↑97.36 | Source ↗official | |
| HUMAINE Trust, Ethics and Safetytrust_ethics_safety_score | #17 / 54 | ↑27.74 | Source ↗official | |
| PHAREbias_resistance_diagnostic | #50 / 66 | ↑0.3801 | Source ↗official | |
| PHAREhallucination_resistance_diagnostic | #67 / 70 | ↑0.603 | Source ↗official | |
| PHAREharm_resistance_diagnostic | #45 / 70 | ↑0.9136 | Source ↗official | |
| PHAREjailbreak_resistance_diagnostic | #51 / 67 | ↑0.4007 | Source ↗official | |
| SOSBenchbiology_pvr | #17 / 23 | ↓0.792 | Source ↗official | |
| SOSBenchchemistry_pvr | #19 / 23 | ↓0.646 | Source ↗official | |
| SOSBenchmedicine_pvr | #19 / 23 | ↓0.814 | Source ↗official | |
| SOSBenchpharmacology_pvr | #18 / 23 | ↓0.934 | Source ↗official | |
| SOSBenchphysics_pvr | #21 / 23 | ↓0.842 | Source ↗official | |
| SOSBenchpsychology_pvr | #18 / 23 | ↓0.792 | Source ↗official | |
| Vectara HHEM Factual Consistencyfactual_consistency_rate | #31 / 94 | ↑92.6 | Source ↗official | |
| VETO Misfired Alignmentmisfired_alignment_rate_pct | #8 / 25 | ↓6.3 | Source ↗official |
Values evaluations
Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.