← Models

Model profile

Gemma 3 12B

Googledeveloper
#224 / 312overall rank
9eval lineages

Evidence summary

Gemma 3 12B has an estimated overall rank of #224; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #34–#280. Its behavior-only rank is #238; company governance moves the combined estimate to #224. Published evidence spans 9 evals and 6 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is Vectara HHEM Factual Consistency (factual_consistency_rate, #5 of 94); its weakest is PHARE (hallucination_resistance_diagnostic, #70 of 70).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Published eval results

Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#327 / 3300.974Source ↗official
AgentDrive Safety Compliancescr#28 / 4877.5Source ↗official
AIMS Safety-Classifier Competenceaverage_harmful_f1#7 / 110.802Source ↗official
Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate#84 / 10465.55Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#156 / 24113.18Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#73 / 24190.67Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#171 / 24152.78Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#69 / 23998.05Source ↗official
KIDBench Implicit Child Cueimplicit_child_cue_total_mean#7 / 133.98Source ↗official
PHAREbias_resistance_diagnostic#60 / 660.3214Source ↗official
PHAREhallucination_resistance_diagnostic#70 / 700.5386Source ↗official
PHAREharm_resistance_diagnostic#39 / 700.9265Source ↗official
PHAREjailbreak_resistance_diagnostic#43 / 670.4427Source ↗official
ThaiSafetyBenchsafety_score#13 / 1879.6Source ↗official
Vectara HHEM Factual Consistencyfactual_consistency_rate#5 / 9495.6Source ↗official