← Models

Model profile

Gemma 2 9B It

Googledeveloper
2024-06-27release date
#203 / 312overall rank
9eval lineages

Evidence summary

Gemma 2 9B It has an estimated overall rank of #203; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #82–#242. Its behavior-only rank is #212; company governance moves the combined estimate to #203. Published evidence spans 9 evals and 7 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #17 of 241); its weakest is Large-scale Moral Machine experiment on LLMs (human_choice_distance, #38 of 39).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Published eval results

Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatchild_sexual_exploitation#4 / 326.7Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatdefamation#7 / 328.5Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chathate#7 / 323.5Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatindiscriminate_weapons_cbrne#8 / 3212.8Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatintellectual_property#8 / 325.8Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatnon_violent_crimes#8 / 328.8Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatprivacy#7 / 326.9Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsex_related_crimes#5 / 326.5Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsexual_content#6 / 326.4Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatspecialized_advice#5 / 328Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsuicide_self_harm#6 / 325.8Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatviolent_crimes#7 / 3210.2Source ↗official
COMPL-AI AI-Identity Disclosurescore#5 / 140.9863Source ↗official
COMPL-AI LLM RuLES Multi-Turn Rule Followingscore#6 / 140.4996Source ↗official
COMPL-AI TensorTrust Goal-Hijacking Resistancescore#7 / 130.4858Source ↗official
DSPSafeBenchscore#8 / 1272.34Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#117 / 24116.02Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#17 / 24195.17Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#81 / 24181.11Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#231 / 23970Source ↗official
IndoBias-Pairs — parity-aware culturally grounded biasparity_score#12 / 2685.94Source ↗official
Large-scale Moral Machine experiment on LLMshuman_choice_distance#38 / 391.869Source ↗official
OR-Benchover_refusal_rate#16 / 2579.9Source ↗official
OR-Benchtoxic_acceptance_rate#9 / 251.5Source ↗official
SORRY-Benchavg#8 / 510.1Source ↗official
SYCON Benchfalse_presupposition_tof#10 / 111.86Source ↗official
SYCON Benchunethical_queries_tof#3 / 112.36Source ↗official

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

UGI Political Values

DimensionValueDistribution
Political Lean-25.3
Government47.4
Diplomacy67.1
Economy46.1
Society60.6