← Models

Model profile

Gemma 2 2B It

Googledeveloper
2024-07-31release date
#220 / 267overall rank
4eval lineages

Evidence summary

Gemma 2 2B It has an estimated overall rank of #220; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #59–#248. Its behavior-only rank is #229; company governance moves the combined estimate to #220. Published evidence spans 4 evals and 5 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is PandaBench JBB direct-request panel (safety_rate, #1 of 46); its weakest is Large-scale Moral Machine experiment on LLMs (human_choice_distance, #39 of 39).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Published eval results

Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionBetterSource
DSPSafeBenchscore#10 / 1270.42↑ higherSource ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#62 / 26025.84↑ higherSource ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#173 / 26086↑ higherSource ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#117 / 26074.44↑ higherSource ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#230 / 25884.14↑ higherSource ↗official
Large-scale Moral Machine experiment on LLMshuman_choice_distance#39 / 391.922↓ lowerSource ↗official
PandaBench JBB direct-request panelsafety_rate#1 / 461↑ higherSource ↗official

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

UGI Political Values

DimensionValueDistribution
Political Lean-30.1
Government46.5
Diplomacy64.6
Economy53.1
Society59.2