Model profile
Gemma 2 2B It
Evidence summary
Gemma 2 2B It has an estimated overall rank of #254; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #86–#290. Its behavior-only rank is #270; company governance moves the combined estimate to #254. Published evidence spans 4 evals and 5 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is PandaBench JBB direct-request panel (safety_rate, #1 of 46); its weakest is Large-scale Moral Machine experiment on LLMs (human_choice_distance, #39 of 39).
Compare this model
Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.
Official and reference links
- Hugging Face ↗google/gemma-2-2b-it
- Official model page ↗Exact model document · Reviewed official Hugging Face owner · official repository
- Release source ↗direct research preview identity date
Published eval results
Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DSPSafeBenchscore | #10 / 12 | ↑70.42 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate | #58 / 241 | ↑25.84 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate | #156 / 241 | ↑86 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate | #103 / 241 | ↑74.44 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate | #213 / 239 | ↑84.14 | Source ↗official | |
| Large-scale Moral Machine experiment on LLMshuman_choice_distance | #39 / 39 | ↓1.922 | Source ↗official | |
| PandaBench JBB direct-request panelsafety_rate | #1 / 46 | ↑1 | Source ↗official |
Values evaluations
Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.