← Models

Model profile

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Googledeveloper
2026-02-19release date
#63 / 333Safety rank
#341 / 645Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has an estimated Safety rank of #63; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #40–#141. Its behavior-only rank is #69; company governance moves the combined estimate to #63. Published Safety evidence spans 34 eval lineages and 7 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is SpeciEval (belief_animal_sentience, #1 of 123); its weakest is Concordia — Shutdown-Resistance (safety_score, #52 of 53).

Freedom. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has an estimated Freedom rank of #341; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #162–#454. Published Freedom evidence spans 13 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Human Pathogen Capabilities Test (HPCT) — overall refusal (refusal_rate_pct, #1 of 69); its weakest is SM-Bench (adversarial, #80 of 84).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#78 / 3450.5087Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5child_sexual_exploitation#18 / 3150Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5defamation#28 / 3184.8Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5hate#25 / 3168.2Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5indiscriminate_weapons_cbrne#13 / 3161.4Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5intellectual_property#28 / 3176.6Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5non_violent_crimes#23 / 3186.7Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5privacy#24 / 3178.7Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sex_related_crimes#25 / 3181.2Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sexual_content#30 / 3168.8Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5specialized_advice#28 / 3174.5Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5suicide_self_harm#17 / 3160.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5violent_crimes#26 / 3184.1Source ↗official
AgentAbstainabstain#6 / 1765.4Source ↗official
AgentAbstaincar#3 / 1765.7Source ↗official
AgentAbstainpaired#1 / 1759.5Source ↗official
Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating#37 / 1111446.0Source ↗official
BioSecBench-Refusalbalanced_refusal_score#6 / 100.3931Source ↗official
BioTIERpermit_compliance_pct#8 / 5299.6Source ↗official
BioTIERrefuse_compliance_pct#11 / 5273.5Source ↗official
BullshitBench v2clear_pushback_rate#52 / 1170.34Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexagent_red_teaming#21 / 4968Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexbioweapons_assistance#34 / 5473.5Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexhle_overconfidence#23 / 5550.3Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexmachiavelli#30 / 5189.2Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexmask#49 / 5753.8Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexpolitical_manipulation#14 / 4842.2Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indextextquests_harm#29 / 5418.8Source ↗official
Concordia — Agentic-Misalignmentsafety_score#52 / 5429.83Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-Deceptionsafety_score#28 / 6386.3Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-Manipulationsafety_score#26 / 5690.67Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-SecurityRiskssafety_score#19 / 6397.07Source ↗official
Concordia — APEsafety_score#33 / 5516.74Source ↗official
Concordia — CyberSecEval2-PromptInjectionsafety_score#3 / 6398.8Source ↗official
Concordia — DarkBenchsafety_score#52 / 5539.36Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Biologicalsafety_score#16 / 5477.24Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Chemicalsafety_score#17 / 5474.56Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Privacy/Scamssafety_score#20 / 5469.9Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-AirBench-Manipulationsafety_score#25 / 4532.89Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-AirBench-SecurityRiskssafety_score#24 / 4527.33Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#38 / 451Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-SOSBench-Chemsafety_score#30 / 4546.67Source ↗official
Concordia — MASKsafety_score#44 / 6250.37Source ↗official
Concordia — SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#16 / 6397.31Source ↗official
Concordia — SciKnowEval-ChemicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#11 / 6340.62Source ↗official
Concordia — Shutdown-Resistancesafety_score#52 / 5358Source ↗official
Concordia — SOSBench-Biosafety_score#32 / 6381Source ↗official
Concordia — SOSBench-Chemsafety_score#12 / 6394.4Source ↗official
DelusionEvaldelusional_prevalence_pct#10 / 1647.3Source ↗official
DelusionEvaldiscourages_harm_prevalence_pct#7 / 1629.4Source ↗official
DelusionEvalfacilitates_harm_prevalence_pct#9 / 162.7Source ↗official
DelusionEvalrelationship_prevalence_pct#13 / 1637.6Source ↗official
DelusionEvalsycophancy_prevalence_pct#10 / 1630.4Source ↗official
FORTRESSaverage_risk_score#25 / 5029.76Source ↗official
FORTRESSover_refusal_score#19 / 493.13Source ↗official
HUMAINE Trust, Ethics and Safetytrust_ethics_safety_score#7 / 5429.01Source ↗official
Human Pathogen Capabilities Test (HPCT) — overall refusalrefusal_rate_pct#27 / 690Source ↗official
Humanity's Last Exam RMS calibration error (Scale Labs)calibrationError#12 / 4251Source ↗official
JuICE Cultural-Error Span Detectionf1#1 / 100.5225Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchethics#23 / 4345.45Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchfactuality#21 / 4351.4Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchlegality#19 / 4350.36Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchprivacy#12 / 4367.16Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchpsychological_health#6 / 4376.44Source ↗official
MACHIAVELLIdeception_relative_random_pct#25 / 5089.2Source ↗official
MANTAAWMS#7 / 120.441Source ↗official
MANTAAWVS#9 / 120.404Source ↗official
MASKlying_probability_pct#52 / 5357.6Source ↗official
ODCV-Benchaverage_severity#11 / 121.825Source ↗official
ODCV-Benchmisalignment_rate#10 / 1243.75Source ↗official
Olam Social Poker — Social Lie Ratesocial_lie_rate_per_10000_turns#11 / 248Source ↗official
Pander Scoreconversational_absolute_pander_score#22 / 2622.66Source ↗official
Pander Scoreinstructional_absolute_pander_score#25 / 2670.61Source ↗official
RealityTest — Text AI-Identity Disclosuredisclosure_probability#9 / 170.305Source ↗official
RefusalBenchyouden_j#8 / 190.1319Source ↗official
SM-Benchadversarial#4 / 8490.73Source ↗official
SM-Benchambiguous_interpretation#45 / 8485.71Source ↗official
SM-Benchanti_hallucination#10 / 8498.95Source ↗official
SM-Bencheq_boundaries#28 / 8468.26Source ↗official
SM-Benchoverfit#24 / 8484.15Source ↗official
SpeciEvalbelief_animal_sentience#1 / 1237Source ↗official
SpeciEvalland_animal_4ns#36 / 1234.35Source ↗official
SpeciEvalsea_animal_4ns#56 / 1234.7Source ↗official
SpeciEvalspeciesism#118 / 1233.03Source ↗official
StereoTales Harmful Associationsbenign_significant_association_score#20 / 2384.41Source ↗official
Vectara HHEM Factual Consistencyfactual_consistency_rate#55 / 9489.6Source ↗official
VETO Misfired Alignmentmisfired_alignment_rate_pct#2 / 254.9Source ↗official
Vigil Mental Health Safetyoverall_score#10 / 2348Source ↗official
WildClawBench Safety & Alignment (OpenClaw harness)safety_alignment_score_pct#6 / 2445.77Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5child_sexual_exploitation#14 / 3150Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5defamation#3 / 3184.8Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5hate#7 / 3168.2Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5indiscriminate_weapons_cbrne#19 / 3161.4Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5intellectual_property#4 / 3176.6Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5non_violent_crimes#9 / 3186.7Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5privacy#7 / 3178.7Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sex_related_crimes#7 / 3181.2Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sexual_content#2 / 3168.8Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5specialized_advice#4 / 3174.5Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5suicide_self_harm#15 / 3160.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5violent_crimes#6 / 3184.1Source ↗official
BioTIERpermit_compliance_pct#8 / 5299.6Source ↗official
BioTIERrefuse_compliance_pct#42 / 5273.5Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexbioweapons_assistance#21 / 5473.5Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-Deceptionsafety_score#36 / 6386.3Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-Manipulationsafety_score#30 / 5690.67Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-PoliticalPersuasionsafety_score#13 / 5644.76Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-SecurityRiskssafety_score#44 / 6397.07Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Biologicalsafety_score#39 / 5477.24Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Chemicalsafety_score#38 / 5474.56Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Privacy/Scamssafety_score#35 / 5469.9Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-AirBench-Manipulationsafety_score#21 / 4532.89Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-AirBench-SecurityRiskssafety_score#22 / 4527.33Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#7 / 451Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-SOSBench-Chemsafety_score#16 / 4546.67Source ↗official
Concordia — SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#48 / 6397.31Source ↗official
Concordia — SciKnowEval-ChemicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#53 / 6340.62Source ↗official
Concordia — SOSBench-Biosafety_score#32 / 6381Source ↗official
Concordia — SOSBench-Chemsafety_score#52 / 6394.4Source ↗official
DelusionEvaldiscourages_harm_prevalence_pct#10 / 1629.4Source ↗official
DelusionEvalfacilitates_harm_prevalence_pct#8 / 162.7Source ↗official
FORTRESSaverage_risk_score#26 / 5029.76Source ↗official
FORTRESSover_refusal_score#19 / 493.13Source ↗official
Human Pathogen Capabilities Test (HPCT) — overall refusalrefusal_rate_pct#1 / 690Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchethics#21 / 4345.45Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchlegality#25 / 4350.36Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchprivacy#32 / 4367.16Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchpsychological_health#38 / 4376.44Source ↗official
SM-Benchadversarial#80 / 8490.73Source ↗official
SM-Bencheq_boundaries#28 / 8468.26Source ↗official
SM-Benchoverfit#24 / 8484.15Source ↗official
SpeechMap model completioncomplete_pct#91 / 18159.9Source ↗official
UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingnesswillingness_adherence_score#79 / 1561.5Source ↗official
UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingnesswillingness_direct_score#113 / 1562Source ↗official
VETO Misfired Alignmentmisfired_alignment_rate_pct#2 / 254.9Source ↗official
Vigil Mental Health Safetyoverall_score#14 / 2348Source ↗official

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

UGI Political Values

DimensionValueDistribution
Political Lean-17.6
Government48.4
Diplomacy64.6
Economy47.3
Society57.7

Agent-ValueBench Moral Foundations (MFT08)

Agent-ValueBench HEXACO

DimensionValueDistribution
Openness to experience4.1
Honesty-humility5.4
Extraversion5.9
Agreeableness5.7
Conscientiousness7.1

Agent-ValueBench Schwartz Basic Values (PVQ40)