← Models

Model profile

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Googledeveloper
2026-02-19release date
#37 / 312overall rank
29eval lineages

Evidence summary

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has an estimated overall rank of #37; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #16–#124. Its behavior-only rank is #38; company governance moves the combined estimate to #37. Published evidence spans 29 evals and 7 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is SpeciEval (belief_animal_sentience, #1 of 113); its weakest is MASK (lying_probability_pct, #52 of 53).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Published eval results

Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#62 / 3300.5087Source ↗official
AgentAbstainabstain#6 / 1765.4Source ↗official
AgentAbstaincar#3 / 1765.7Source ↗official
AgentAbstainpaired#1 / 1759.5Source ↗official
Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating#38 / 1121446.0Source ↗official
BioSecBench-Refusalbalanced_refusal_score#6 / 100.3931Source ↗official
BullshitBench v2clear_pushback_rate#43 / 1060.34Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexagent_red_teaming#18 / 4568Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexbioweapons_assistance#30 / 5073.5Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexhle_overconfidence#20 / 5150.3Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexmachiavelli#26 / 4789.2Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexmask#45 / 5353.8Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexpolitical_manipulation#12 / 3442.2Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indextextquests_harm#28 / 5018.8Source ↗official
DelusionEvaldelusional_prevalence_pct#10 / 1647.3Source ↗official
DelusionEvaldiscourages_harm_prevalence_pct#7 / 1629.4Source ↗official
DelusionEvalfacilitates_harm_prevalence_pct#9 / 162.7Source ↗official
DelusionEvalrelationship_prevalence_pct#13 / 1637.6Source ↗official
DelusionEvalsycophancy_prevalence_pct#10 / 1630.4Source ↗official
FORTRESSaverage_risk_score#24 / 4929.76Source ↗official
FORTRESSover_refusal_score#19 / 483.13Source ↗official
HUMAINE Trust, Ethics and Safetytrust_ethics_safety_score#7 / 5429.01Source ↗official
Humanity's Last Exam RMS calibration error (Scale Labs)calibrationError#10 / 3951Source ↗official
JuICE Cultural-Error Span Detectionf1#1 / 100.5225Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchethics#23 / 4345.45Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchfactuality#21 / 4351.4Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchlegality#19 / 4350.36Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchprivacy#12 / 4367.16Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchpsychological_health#6 / 4376.44Source ↗official
MACHIAVELLIdeception_relative_random_pct#25 / 5089.2Source ↗official
MASKlying_probability_pct#52 / 5357.6Source ↗official
ODCV-Benchaverage_severity#11 / 121.825Source ↗official
ODCV-Benchmisalignment_rate#10 / 1243.75Source ↗official
Olam Social Poker — Social Lie Ratesocial_lie_rate_per_10000_turns#9 / 198Source ↗official
Pander Scoreconversational_absolute_pander_score#16 / 2022.66Source ↗official
Pander Scoreinstructional_absolute_pander_score#19 / 2070.61Source ↗official
RealityTest — Text AI-Identity Disclosuredisclosure_probability#9 / 170.305Source ↗official
RefusalBenchyouden_j#8 / 190.1319Source ↗official
SM-Benchadversarial#4 / 7990.73Source ↗official
SM-Benchambiguous_interpretation#40 / 7985.71Source ↗official
SM-Benchanti_hallucination#8 / 7998.95Source ↗official
SM-Bencheq_boundaries#26 / 7968.26Source ↗official
SM-Benchoverfit#19 / 7984.15Source ↗official
SpeciEvalbelief_animal_sentience#1 / 1137Source ↗official
SpeciEvalland_animal_4ns#32 / 1134.35Source ↗official
SpeciEvalsea_animal_4ns#49 / 1134.7Source ↗official
SpeciEvalspeciesism#108 / 1133.03Source ↗official
StereoTales Harmful Associationsbenign_significant_association_score#20 / 2384.41Source ↗official
Vectara HHEM Factual Consistencyfactual_consistency_rate#55 / 9489.6Source ↗official
VETO Misfired Alignmentmisfired_alignment_rate_pct#2 / 254.9Source ↗official
Vigil Mental Health Safetyoverall_score#10 / 2348Source ↗official
WildClawBench Safety & Alignment (OpenClaw harness)safety_alignment_score_pct#6 / 2445.77Source ↗official

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

UGI Political Values

DimensionValueDistribution
Political Lean-17.6
Government48.4
Diplomacy64.6
Economy47.3
Society57.7

Agent-ValueBench Moral Foundations (MFT08)

Agent-ValueBench HEXACO

DimensionValueDistribution
Openness to experience4.1
Honesty-humility5.4
Extraversion5.9
Agreeableness5.7
Conscientiousness7.1

Agent-ValueBench Schwartz Basic Values (PVQ40)