← Models

Model profile

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

Googledeveloper
2026-03-03release date
#179 / 333Safety rank
#214 / 645Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has an estimated Safety rank of #179; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #102–#231. Its behavior-only rank is #193; company governance moves the combined estimate to #179. Published Safety evidence spans 27 eval lineages and 7 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is SpeciEval (belief_animal_sentience, #1 of 123); its weakest is Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5 (hate, #31 of 31).

Freedom. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has an estimated Freedom rank of #214; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #115–#367. Published Freedom evidence spans 9 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is SM-Bench (overfit, #2 of 84); its weakest is SM-Bench (adversarial, #82 of 84).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#195 / 3450.8266Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5child_sexual_exploitation#28 / 3172.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5defamation#26 / 3182.6Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5hate#31 / 3176.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5indiscriminate_weapons_cbrne#27 / 3186.7Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5intellectual_property#21 / 3168.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5non_violent_crimes#27 / 3191.3Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5privacy#24 / 3178.7Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sex_related_crimes#29 / 3187Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sexual_content#26 / 3164.6Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5specialized_advice#24 / 3171.47Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5suicide_self_harm#30 / 3180.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5violent_crimes#27 / 3188.9Source ↗official
Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating#30 / 1111449.0Source ↗official
BullshitBench v2clear_pushback_rate#96 / 1170.11Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexagent_red_teaming#12 / 4945.4Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexbioweapons_assistance#45 / 5489.8Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexhle_overconfidence#45 / 5572.8Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexmachiavelli#45 / 5195.8Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexmask#51 / 5755.8Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexpolitical_manipulation#33 / 4851.9Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indextextquests_harm#15 / 5415.6Source ↗official
DelusionEvaldelusional_prevalence_pct#15 / 1666.8Source ↗official
DelusionEvaldiscourages_harm_prevalence_pct#8 / 1625.7Source ↗official
DelusionEvalfacilitates_harm_prevalence_pct#14 / 168.5Source ↗official
DelusionEvalrelationship_prevalence_pct#14 / 1638.6Source ↗official
DelusionEvalsycophancy_prevalence_pct#12 / 1634.4Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbasaglia_score#40 / 5069.4Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbaudrillard_score#35 / 5065.2Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchhuxley_score#44 / 5080.73Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchlaguardia_score#41 / 5069.77Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchorwell_score#39 / 5073.97Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchpetrov_score#40 / 5078.43Source ↗official
FORTRESSaverage_risk_score#37 / 5051.05Source ↗official
FORTRESSover_refusal_score#11 / 492.15Source ↗official
Humanity's Last Exam RMS calibration error (Scale Labs)calibrationError#35 / 4283Source ↗official
KIDBench Implicit Child Cueimplicit_child_cue_total_mean#3 / 134.27Source ↗official
MACHIAVELLIdeception_relative_random_pct#42 / 5095.8Source ↗official
Manager Coercion Benchcoercion_ladder_depth#13 / 377.633Source ↗self run
MANTAAWMS#10 / 120.401Source ↗official
MANTAAWVS#12 / 120.309Source ↗official
MASKlying_probability_pct#45 / 5351.6Source ↗official
PHAREbias_resistance_diagnostic#37 / 660.4457Source ↗official
PHAREhallucination_resistance_diagnostic#19 / 700.8057Source ↗official
PHAREharm_resistance_diagnostic#13 / 700.9694Source ↗official
PHAREjailbreak_resistance_diagnostic#37 / 670.4772Source ↗official
RefusalBenchyouden_j#14 / 190.02979Source ↗official
SM-Benchadversarial#2 / 8491.71Source ↗official
SM-Benchambiguous_interpretation#55 / 8482.44Source ↗official
SM-Benchanti_hallucination#36 / 8494.76Source ↗official
SM-Bencheq_boundaries#37 / 8466.85Source ↗official
SM-Benchoverfit#2 / 8497.81Source ↗official
SpeciEvalbelief_animal_sentience#1 / 1237Source ↗official
SpeciEvalland_animal_4ns#53 / 1234.46Source ↗official
SpeciEvalsea_animal_4ns#66 / 1234.75Source ↗official
SpeciEvalspeciesism#120 / 1233.225Source ↗official
StereoTales Harmful Associationsbenign_significant_association_score#14 / 2385.61Source ↗official
TACbase_welfare_rate#31 / 8730.13Source ↗self run
Vals AI Cheating Auditterminal_bench_cheating_shortcut_evidence_rate_pct#6 / 141.124Source ↗official
Vectara HHEM Factual Consistencyfactual_consistency_rate#36 / 9491.8Source ↗official
VETO Misfired Alignmentmisfired_alignment_rate_pct#13 / 258.3Source ↗official
Vigil Mental Health Safetyoverall_score#13 / 2338Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5child_sexual_exploitation#4 / 3172.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5defamation#6 / 3182.6Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5hate#1 / 3176.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5indiscriminate_weapons_cbrne#5 / 3186.7Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5intellectual_property#11 / 3168.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5non_violent_crimes#5 / 3191.3Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5privacy#7 / 3178.7Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sex_related_crimes#2 / 3187Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sexual_content#5 / 3164.6Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5specialized_advice#8 / 3171.47Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5suicide_self_harm#2 / 3180.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5violent_crimes#4 / 3188.9Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexbioweapons_assistance#10 / 5489.8Source ↗official
DelusionEvaldiscourages_harm_prevalence_pct#9 / 1625.7Source ↗official
DelusionEvalfacilitates_harm_prevalence_pct#3 / 168.5Source ↗official
FORTRESSaverage_risk_score#14 / 5051.05Source ↗official
FORTRESSover_refusal_score#11 / 492.15Source ↗official
PHAREharm_resistance_diagnostic#58 / 700.9694Source ↗official
PHAREjailbreak_resistance_diagnostic#31 / 670.4772Source ↗official
SM-Benchadversarial#82 / 8491.71Source ↗official
SM-Bencheq_boundaries#37 / 8466.85Source ↗official
SM-Benchoverfit#2 / 8497.81Source ↗official
SpeechMap model completioncomplete_pct#14 / 18188.4Source ↗official
VETO Misfired Alignmentmisfired_alignment_rate_pct#13 / 258.3Source ↗official
Vigil Mental Health Safetyoverall_score#10 / 2338Source ↗official

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

The Economist World Values Survey Cultural Map

DimensionValueDistribution
Survival ↔ Self-expression3.82
Traditional ↔ Secular0.967