← Models

Model profile

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

Googledeveloper
2026-03-03release date
#140 / 312overall rank
25eval lineages

Evidence summary

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has an estimated overall rank of #140; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #75–#207. Its behavior-only rank is #154; company governance moves the combined estimate to #140. Published evidence spans 25 evals and 7 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is SpeciEval (belief_animal_sentience, #1 of 113); its weakest is MANTA (AWVS, #7 of 7).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Published eval results

Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#179 / 3300.8266Source ↗official
Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating#30 / 1121449.0Source ↗official
BullshitBench v2clear_pushback_rate#85 / 1060.11Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexagent_red_teaming#9 / 4545.4Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexbioweapons_assistance#41 / 5089.8Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexhle_overconfidence#41 / 5172.8Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexmachiavelli#41 / 4795.8Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexmask#47 / 5355.8Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexpolitical_manipulation#26 / 3451.9Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indextextquests_harm#14 / 5015.6Source ↗official
DelusionEvaldelusional_prevalence_pct#15 / 1666.8Source ↗official
DelusionEvaldiscourages_harm_prevalence_pct#8 / 1625.7Source ↗official
DelusionEvalfacilitates_harm_prevalence_pct#14 / 168.5Source ↗official
DelusionEvalrelationship_prevalence_pct#14 / 1638.6Source ↗official
DelusionEvalsycophancy_prevalence_pct#12 / 1634.4Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbasaglia_score#40 / 5069.4Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbaudrillard_score#35 / 5065.2Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchhuxley_score#44 / 5080.73Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchlaguardia_score#41 / 5069.77Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchorwell_score#39 / 5073.97Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchpetrov_score#40 / 5078.43Source ↗official
FORTRESSaverage_risk_score#36 / 4951.05Source ↗official
FORTRESSover_refusal_score#11 / 482.15Source ↗official
Humanity's Last Exam RMS calibration error (Scale Labs)calibrationError#32 / 3983Source ↗official
KIDBench Implicit Child Cueimplicit_child_cue_total_mean#3 / 134.27Source ↗official
MACHIAVELLIdeception_relative_random_pct#42 / 5095.8Source ↗official
Manager Coercion Benchcoercion_ladder_depth#10 / 337.633Source ↗self run
MANTAAWMS#5 / 70.401Source ↗official
MANTAAWVS#7 / 70.309Source ↗official
MASKlying_probability_pct#45 / 5351.6Source ↗official
PHAREbias_resistance_diagnostic#37 / 660.4457Source ↗official
PHAREhallucination_resistance_diagnostic#19 / 700.8057Source ↗official
PHAREharm_resistance_diagnostic#13 / 700.9694Source ↗official
PHAREjailbreak_resistance_diagnostic#37 / 670.4772Source ↗official
RefusalBenchyouden_j#14 / 190.02979Source ↗official
SM-Benchadversarial#2 / 7991.71Source ↗official
SM-Benchambiguous_interpretation#50 / 7982.44Source ↗official
SM-Benchanti_hallucination#31 / 7994.76Source ↗official
SM-Bencheq_boundaries#34 / 7966.85Source ↗official
SM-Benchoverfit#2 / 7997.81Source ↗official
SpeciEvalbelief_animal_sentience#1 / 1137Source ↗official
SpeciEvalland_animal_4ns#48 / 1134.46Source ↗official
SpeciEvalsea_animal_4ns#58 / 1134.75Source ↗official
SpeciEvalspeciesism#110 / 1133.225Source ↗official
StereoTales Harmful Associationsbenign_significant_association_score#14 / 2385.61Source ↗official
TACbase_welfare_rate#26 / 7630.13Source ↗self run
Vectara HHEM Factual Consistencyfactual_consistency_rate#36 / 9491.8Source ↗official
VETO Misfired Alignmentmisfired_alignment_rate_pct#13 / 258.3Source ↗official
Vigil Mental Health Safetyoverall_score#13 / 2338Source ↗official

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

The Economist World Values Survey Cultural Map

DimensionValueDistribution
Survival ↔ Self-expression3.82
Traditional ↔ Secular0.967