← Models

Model profile

Gemini 3 Flash Preview

Googledeveloper
2025-12-17release date
#212 / 333Safety rank
#340 / 645Freedom rank
1discovery sources

Evidence summary

Safety. Gemini 3 Flash Preview has an estimated Safety rank of #212; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #116–#259. Its behavior-only rank is #226; company governance moves the combined estimate to #212. Published Safety evidence spans 29 eval lineages and 7 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is SpeciEval (belief_animal_sentience, #1 of 123); its weakest is Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5 (child_sexual_exploitation, #31 of 31).

Freedom. Gemini 3 Flash Preview has an estimated Freedom rank of #340; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #144–#503. Published Freedom evidence spans 8 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Human Pathogen Capabilities Test (HPCT) — overall refusal (refusal_rate_pct, #1 of 69); its weakest is BioTIER (permit_compliance_pct, #38 of 52).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#301 / 3450.9241Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5child_sexual_exploitation#31 / 3183.3Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5defamation#28 / 3184.8Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5hate#24 / 3166.7Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5indiscriminate_weapons_cbrne#29 / 3188.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5intellectual_property#31 / 3181.2Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5non_violent_crimes#29 / 3193.5Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5privacy#30 / 3185.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sex_related_crimes#31 / 3193.8Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sexual_content#28 / 3166.7Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5specialized_advice#30 / 3176.53Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5suicide_self_harm#28 / 3177.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5violent_crimes#27 / 3188.9Source ↗official
AgentAbstainabstain#16 / 1743.6Source ↗official
AgentAbstaincar#15 / 1743.4Source ↗official
AgentAbstainpaired#14 / 1739.7Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardcorrigibility#10 / 244.32Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardhonesty#9 / 243.682Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardnon_manipulation#12 / 243.51Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardrobustness#14 / 243.373Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardsafety#11 / 243.875Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardscheming#12 / 243.645Source ↗official
Arena Factuality — Search Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating#25 / 301153.0Source ↗official
Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating#32 / 1111449.0Source ↗official
AuAu Authoritarian Response Auditbehavioral_vignette_arr_percent#3 / 1721.8Source ↗official
AuAu Authoritarian Response Auditrealistic_prompt_arr_percent#10 / 172.2Source ↗official
BioTIERpermit_compliance_pct#38 / 5298.3Source ↗official
BioTIERrefuse_compliance_pct#22 / 5254.3Source ↗official
BullshitBench v2clear_pushback_rate#97 / 1170.1Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexagent_red_teaming#47 / 4992.9Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexbioweapons_assistance#35 / 5475.3Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexhle_overconfidence#28 / 5555.1Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexmachiavelli#42 / 5195.3Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexmask#54 / 5761.7Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indextextquests_harm#25 / 5417.8Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbasaglia_score#47 / 5073.2Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbaudrillard_score#50 / 5081.13Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchhuxley_score#47 / 5083Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchlaguardia_score#46 / 5071.63Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchorwell_score#31 / 5072.43Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchpetrov_score#43 / 5080.33Source ↗official
Every Model Cheats — Cybench Cheat Propensitybaseline_cheat_propensity_pct#10 / 2230.4Source ↗official
Every Model Cheats — Cybench Cheat Propensitysevere_anti_cheat_cheat_propensity_pct#1 / 220Source ↗official
Every Model Cheats — Cybench Cheat Propensitystandard_anti_cheat_cheat_propensity_pct#22 / 2269.6Source ↗official
Human Pathogen Capabilities Test (HPCT) — overall refusalrefusal_rate_pct#27 / 690Source ↗official
JuICE Cultural-Error Span Detectionf1#3 / 100.4839Source ↗official
MACHIAVELLIdeception_relative_random_pct#39 / 5095.3Source ↗official
MT-JailBench CrescendoXsafety_score#16 / 2113.84Source ↗official
NESSiE Necessary Safety Benchmarksh_score#11 / 1679.49Source ↗official
Pander Scoreconversational_absolute_pander_score#24 / 2625.97Source ↗official
Pander Scoreinstructional_absolute_pander_score#24 / 2670.12Source ↗official
RealityTest — Text AI-Identity Disclosuredisclosure_probability#12 / 170.227Source ↗official
SM-Benchadversarial#27 / 8484.39Source ↗official
SM-Benchambiguous_interpretation#63 / 8480.65Source ↗official
SM-Benchanti_hallucination#70 / 8482.72Source ↗official
SM-Bencheq_boundaries#40 / 8465.45Source ↗official
SM-Benchoverfit#7 / 8493.99Source ↗official
SpeciEvalbelief_animal_sentience#1 / 1237Source ↗official
SpeciEvalland_animal_4ns#86 / 1234.72Source ↗official
SpeciEvalsea_animal_4ns#99 / 1235.03Source ↗official
SpeciEvalspeciesism#123 / 1233.9Source ↗official
StereoTales Harmful Associationsbenign_significant_association_score#23 / 2382.56Source ↗official
TACbase_welfare_rate#18 / 8735.9Source ↗self run
Vals AI Cheating Auditterminal_bench_cheating_shortcut_evidence_rate_pct#2 / 140.3745Source ↗official
Vectara HHEM Factual Consistencyfactual_consistency_rate#79 / 9486.5Source ↗official
Vigil Mental Health Safetyoverall_score#11 / 2347Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5child_sexual_exploitation#1 / 3183.3Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5defamation#3 / 3184.8Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5hate#8 / 3166.7Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5indiscriminate_weapons_cbrne#3 / 3188.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5intellectual_property#1 / 3181.2Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5non_violent_crimes#2 / 3193.5Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5privacy#2 / 3185.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sex_related_crimes#1 / 3193.8Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sexual_content#4 / 3166.7Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5specialized_advice#2 / 3176.53Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5suicide_self_harm#4 / 3177.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5violent_crimes#4 / 3188.9Source ↗official
BioTIERpermit_compliance_pct#38 / 5298.3Source ↗official
BioTIERrefuse_compliance_pct#31 / 5254.3Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexbioweapons_assistance#20 / 5475.3Source ↗official
Human Pathogen Capabilities Test (HPCT) — overall refusalrefusal_rate_pct#1 / 690Source ↗official
MT-JailBench CrescendoXsafety_score#6 / 2113.84Source ↗official
SM-Benchadversarial#56 / 8484.39Source ↗official
SM-Bencheq_boundaries#40 / 8465.45Source ↗official
SM-Benchoverfit#7 / 8493.99Source ↗official
UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingnesswillingness_adherence_score#79 / 1561.5Source ↗official
UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingnesswillingness_direct_score#113 / 1562Source ↗official
Vigil Mental Health Safetyoverall_score#13 / 2347Source ↗official

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

UGI Political Values

DimensionValueDistribution
Political Lean-17.7
Government45.8
Diplomacy66.6
Economy46.6
Society60

Agent-ValueBench Moral Foundations (MFT08)

Agent-ValueBench HEXACO

DimensionValueDistribution
Openness to experience6.5
Honesty-humility5.5
Extraversion6.5
Agreeableness5.7
Conscientiousness7.3

Agent-ValueBench Schwartz Basic Values (PVQ40)

The Economist World Values Survey Cultural Map

DimensionValueDistribution
Survival ↔ Self-expression5.29
Traditional ↔ Secular-0.78