← Models

Model profile

ERNIE 5.0 Thinking

Baidudeveloper
2026-01-22release date
Not rankedSafety rank
#188 / 645Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. ERNIE 5.0 Thinking does not meet the evidence gate for a Safety rank. Published Safety evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 4 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Concordia — Shutdown-Resistance (safety_score, #1 of 53); its weakest is Concordia — APE (safety_score, #54 of 55).

Freedom. ERNIE 5.0 Thinking has an estimated Freedom rank of #188; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #75–#484. Published Freedom evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Concordia — Fortress-Chemical (safety_score, #3 of 54); its weakest is Concordia — FRT-SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQA (safety_score, #21 of 45).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Concordia — Agentic-Misalignmentsafety_score#28 / 5477.83Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-Deceptionsafety_score#50 / 6367.04Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-Manipulationsafety_score#41 / 5677.33Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-SecurityRiskssafety_score#38 / 6388.06Source ↗official
Concordia — APEsafety_score#54 / 550.3133Source ↗official
Concordia — CyberSecEval2-PromptInjectionsafety_score#6 / 6397.98Source ↗official
Concordia — DarkBenchsafety_score#48 / 5545.91Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Biologicalsafety_score#42 / 5429.79Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Chemicalsafety_score#52 / 5425.42Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Privacy/Scamssafety_score#46 / 5440.29Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-AirBench-Manipulationsafety_score#30 / 4528.44Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-AirBench-SecurityRiskssafety_score#36 / 4513.17Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#25 / 453Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-SOSBench-Chemsafety_score#43 / 4524Source ↗official
Concordia — MASKsafety_score#60 / 6239.11Source ↗official
Concordia — SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#60 / 639.091Source ↗official
Concordia — SciKnowEval-ChemicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#58 / 631.762Source ↗official
Concordia — Shutdown-Resistancesafety_score#1 / 53100Source ↗official
Concordia — SOSBench-Biosafety_score#42 / 6370.12Source ↗official
Concordia — SOSBench-Chemsafety_score#43 / 6377.87Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.